Questions Thread #5
Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.
I’m back from vacation and powering through my question queue. But I need some more good questions to keep me going. If there’s anything about poker or gambling that’s on your mind, and you want some feedback, post a comment in this thread.
Tags: questions-thread

This is a situation that I come across frequently, and I’m not sure if I’m approaching the problem in the proper manner.
I’m in the cut-off with 99. It’s folded to a loose and agressive player to my right who raises from middle position. This player has played approximately 50% of all hands dealt and raised 50% of those he’s played. I decide to 3 bet my nines because of the wide raising range of my opponent and my position. The button folds as do the blinds and the villian smooth calls the raise. I’ve sucessfully isolated my target.
The flop is A 8 5 rainbow and the villian bets into us.
I estimate my equity to be around ~45% due to the A on the flop. My target would certainly have raised any A. The pot is 8 small bets (we’ll say the small blind was raked away) so I estimate my pot equity to be 3.5 small bets. It will likely cost me big bets on both the turn and river to call down so my effective odds are 12:5.
Is the best move to raise the flop to protect my equity which will certainly be 3 bet by any A, or call it down allowing our villian to continue bluffing with his unpaired over cards? Is raising the flop, calling the 3 bet and folding the turn unimproved a bad move here? How does the lack of a cap preflop change my equity on the flop?
What changes if the lone overcard is K or Q? My target’s range includes all A’s but indicates he’ll fold the weakest of K’s and a wider range of Q’s.