Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Q&A #99: Taking A Free Card On The Turn, Or Giving It?

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

The free card play is an old limit hold’em standby. Raise the flop with position and a draw, and then if you miss on the turn, check it behind when they check to you. It can be a valuable play, but it also has a few downsides.

  1. It gives away that you have a draw. That can lead you to winning less on the river if your draw gets there.
  2. By using the play, you choose not to bluff, and bluffing might be more profitable. It sometimes becomes much more difficult to pick up the pot without making your draw if you take the free card.
  3. If your draw is strong enough, you may even be able to bet it for value on the turn. In that case, you’re not getting a free card, you’re giving it.

Today Eric asks about a free card play in an extraordinary situation in a loose limit hold’em game.

I’m in a $40/80 limit hold’em game at Commerce Casino. I just sat down and I’m dealt A :club: 2 :club: as a late position blind in the cutoff. UTG+2 raises, middle position player flat calls, I 3-bet, the SB caps – field calls.

flop comes 4 :club: 5 :club: 5 :diamond:

SB bets. UTG+2 raises. MP calls. I 3-bet. field calls.

turn is 8 :spade: . SB checks. UTG+2 checks. MP checks. I check.

River is 8 :club: .

check check check. i bet for value. SB calls. rest field fold i win.

What I should have done on the turn? I don’t think it is likely I will be raised on the turn. I think it is plausible multi people will call the turn so I was wondering if it’d be worth it in terms of equity to get another bet in on the turn. I know on the flop that every extra bet I put in multi-way is to my benefit (stoxtrader’s book – equity). The turn is harder to say since I’ve only one more card to come. With multiple callers and assuming I’m not going to get raised, how many would have to call to make it worthwhile to bet?

Also I think a single 3 to the bottom straight is probably live. and considering I put original raiser on an over-pair, I think an A may win it for me. But that is counterbalanced by the fact someone else may call with a better A high (i.e. AQ or something). But assuming some of the time he hits a set when I hit flush he will win and some of the time my A is good, i just assumed that I had 12 clean outs. What should I do on turn?

Glad to see the Commerce is still rocking it old school in the limit games.

Before I get to the turn question, which I agree is the most interesting point in the hand, I’ll go over the play on the other streets. Preflop, the 3-bet is ok, but I think a call is ok too given that you already have a cold-call in the hand. A2s is by far the weakest suited ace, and there’s a big strength gap between that hand and something like A8s (which I would tend to 3-bet). This 3-bet assumes a wide opening range from UTG+2 and very loose calling standards for most of the players in the game… fair assumptions for a Commerce game, but perhaps not for other limit games.

On the flop, you have an excellent draw with the nut flush draw, the wheel draw, and the ace overcard. Despite the paired flop, I like jamming for value here. You’ll win by the river often enough to justify banging in the bets.

And I like your river value bet a lot. Some people would check this river due to the double-pairing, but given the action thus far, you have no reason to put anyone on a 5 or 8, and you will get calls from pocket pairs and even stiff aces.

So let’s talk about the turn.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Q&A #99: Taking A Free Card On The Turn, Or Giving It?”

SelfMade
@ Mon Jan 28, 2008 01:57:53 AM
1

Can someone define “stiff ace?”

AKQJ10
@ Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:42:37 AM
2

@SelfMade:

I take that to mean the same thing as bare ace, i.e. only an ace and nothing more, here two pair with an ace kicker.

In NLHE:TAP Ed and David Sklansky use something like “stiff ten” to mean a one-card straight on an extremely coordinated board.


It’s good to see the mid-limit games at Commerce playing like their legendary reputation. If it’s really true, as some suggest, that the NL games are getting tougher there then I might want to refresh my LHE skills.

BTR
@ Mon Jan 28, 2008 11:02:43 PM
3

Wow are the $40/$80 limit games really that loose at the Commerce? I have GOT to make a trip out there.

deadmoneywalking
@ Tue Jan 29, 2008 01:48:09 AM
4

I didn’t know that 4 to the flop is considered “loose.”

Nor do I see why a 3-bet is warranted with one EP raiser and a cold caller.

Ad-man
@ Tue Jan 29, 2008 03:51:20 AM
5

Since when did 3 betting early position raisers with A2s become correct play? I would have thought that is an auto fold but not only is this guy doing it, Ed is half way in agreement with the play! What gives? Am I missing something?

Toonces
@ Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:16:55 AM
6

Adman, on this hand, the player is a late-position blind in the cutoff. He’s already in for 1 bet with A2s and a multi-way pot developing. He’s not going to fold for 1 more bet with position, so the only decision is raise vs. call, and I agree with Ed that a call is better here.

Ed Miller
@ Tue Jan 29, 2008 01:11:54 PM
7

Ad-man,

The hero posted a late position blind which alters preflop play considerably. Check out an article I wrote about it a while ago.

Commerce games used to always be quite loose, with 4-6 seeing most flops (for multiple bets often) in the $40-$80 game. It appears that hasn’t changed much in the two years or so since I last played there.

I like calling rather than 3-betting, but I think the 3-bet is ok so long as the initial raiser and the cold-caller are very loose.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>