<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&amp;A #87: Rake and Time Charges and How They Affect Winning Players</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-11910</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-11910</guid>
		<description>I am not sure what the rake is online, but there is a site that all Texas Holdem players should check out I just came across it about 2 weeks and I have been using tips from here to win. I picked up about $200 in the last few days which is a lot for me because I am cheap. They have small tournaments and large ones about 80 per day and the customer service is cool. Its better than sportsbook.com who I used to love. Check it out for yourself

http://www.Texasholdemallin.com

Have fun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure what the rake is online, but there is a site that all Texas Holdem players should check out I just came across it about 2 weeks and I have been using tips from here to win. I picked up about $200 in the last few days which is a lot for me because I am cheap. They have small tournaments and large ones about 80 per day and the customer service is cool. Its better than sportsbook.com who I used to love. Check it out for yourself</p>
<p><a href="http://www.Texasholdemallin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Texasholdemallin.com</a></p>
<p>Have fun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vinylright</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10767</link>
		<dc:creator>vinylright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 02:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10767</guid>
		<description>online play was great for the first 5 years. i learned more than i could have imagined, but it took both live play and online to get better. now i pretty much only play in casinos. legislation change brought out a different side of online poker i do not care for any more. and 2/5 and 5/10 nl is very beatable in the casino. my exclusive casino is the taj, look me up if you are there, im the only one there ever with the vt hat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>online play was great for the first 5 years. i learned more than i could have imagined, but it took both live play and online to get better. now i pretty much only play in casinos. legislation change brought out a different side of online poker i do not care for any more. and 2/5 and 5/10 nl is very beatable in the casino. my exclusive casino is the taj, look me up if you are there, im the only one there ever with the vt hat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10286</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10286</guid>
		<description>Borg,

That&#039;s a rough rake. Yeah, I&#039;d start to analyze it by saying that most pots hit the rake cap, so a &quot;standard&quot; rake would be roughly $4 every 10 hands, or $0.40/hand. Since you&#039;re playing tighter than your opponents, you might win fewer than 1/10 of the pots, so perhaps you pay only $0.35/hand on average.

So your rake is roughly $0.40/hand higher than average. If a good player could win $20/hour in a soft $5-$10 live game with a &quot;standard&quot; rake (I think that&#039;s doable), then perhaps you could manage $8/hour in your game, since at 30 hands/hour and $0.40/hand extra, you&#039;re paying $12/hour extra.

That&#039;s rough. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s unbeatable, but it would obviously chop a good player&#039;s win very considerably, and it would turn most marginal/decent players into net losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Borg,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a rough rake. Yeah, I&#8217;d start to analyze it by saying that most pots hit the rake cap, so a &#8220;standard&#8221; rake would be roughly $4 every 10 hands, or $0.40/hand. Since you&#8217;re playing tighter than your opponents, you might win fewer than 1/10 of the pots, so perhaps you pay only $0.35/hand on average.</p>
<p>So your rake is roughly $0.40/hand higher than average. If a good player could win $20/hour in a soft $5-$10 live game with a &#8220;standard&#8221; rake (I think that&#8217;s doable), then perhaps you could manage $8/hour in your game, since at 30 hands/hour and $0.40/hand extra, you&#8217;re paying $12/hour extra.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s rough. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s unbeatable, but it would obviously chop a good player&#8217;s win very considerably, and it would turn most marginal/decent players into net losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borg</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10285</link>
		<dc:creator>Borg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10285</guid>
		<description>What sort of data do I need to be collecting to evaluate a hand fee rather than a rake or time fee?

This article came just as I&#039;m evaluating the rake structure of the $5/$10 Limit game here (the only one in town).
This game is perfect for me as I&#039;m new to live limit HE (though not HE in general) and it fits the profile of Ed&#039;s &#039;Small Stakes HE&#039; book - it seems to be 6 to a flop minimum with not a thinking player in sight; every hand, all day long (haven&#039;t tried it at night yet).  So I&#039;m having fun exploring the ideas in the book and not getting beat up while I practice.

The rake is $0.75 per hand though and has made me wonder if in the end I will end up paying for this experience rather than have it pay for itself.

If I consider how much money is taken off the table ($7.50/hand) then how can I estimate how much more this would be than a regular rake?  As we are seeing average 6 - 8 people every flop and loose passive afterwards, pots are generally rather big (10BB at min and much more when I&#039;m in there raising away and they&#039;re calling!).
So if I roughly assume all pots would be big enough to hit the cap (not actually true of course but not far from it), is this rake simply $3+ in excess of a reasonable rake?  This sounds very bad to me, even though to call this game soft is a severe understatement.

Would love some help on getting a grasp on the right maths to solve this.
Do I need to know average pot sizes as well as my own percentage of pots played, won and lost ? How to piece it together ?

Any comments at all about per hand fee issues are appreciated.

Thanks (oh and Ed, loving SSHE btw, learning to play is fun when you&#039;re not the fish!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sort of data do I need to be collecting to evaluate a hand fee rather than a rake or time fee?</p>
<p>This article came just as I&#8217;m evaluating the rake structure of the $5/$10 Limit game here (the only one in town).<br />
This game is perfect for me as I&#8217;m new to live limit HE (though not HE in general) and it fits the profile of Ed&#8217;s &#8216;Small Stakes HE&#8217; book &#8211; it seems to be 6 to a flop minimum with not a thinking player in sight; every hand, all day long (haven&#8217;t tried it at night yet).  So I&#8217;m having fun exploring the ideas in the book and not getting beat up while I practice.</p>
<p>The rake is $0.75 per hand though and has made me wonder if in the end I will end up paying for this experience rather than have it pay for itself.</p>
<p>If I consider how much money is taken off the table ($7.50/hand) then how can I estimate how much more this would be than a regular rake?  As we are seeing average 6 &#8211; 8 people every flop and loose passive afterwards, pots are generally rather big (10BB at min and much more when I&#8217;m in there raising away and they&#8217;re calling!).<br />
So if I roughly assume all pots would be big enough to hit the cap (not actually true of course but not far from it), is this rake simply $3+ in excess of a reasonable rake?  This sounds very bad to me, even though to call this game soft is a severe understatement.</p>
<p>Would love some help on getting a grasp on the right maths to solve this.<br />
Do I need to know average pot sizes as well as my own percentage of pots played, won and lost ? How to piece it together ?</p>
<p>Any comments at all about per hand fee issues are appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks (oh and Ed, loving SSHE btw, learning to play is fun when you&#8217;re not the fish!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DucksTakinDownAKSuffer</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10265</link>
		<dc:creator>DucksTakinDownAKSuffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10265</guid>
		<description>SelfMade - thanks for the BB correction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SelfMade &#8211; thanks for the BB correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loyo</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10242</link>
		<dc:creator>loyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10242</guid>
		<description>Good  article, Ed.  Wondered if you had any thoughts on Harrah&#039;s recent rake increase to 10% max $5/$1 JP? (for both no-limit and limit games---a  few of us are still playing small stakes limit.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good  article, Ed.  Wondered if you had any thoughts on Harrah&#8217;s recent rake increase to 10% max $5/$1 JP? (for both no-limit and limit games&#8212;a  few of us are still playing small stakes limit.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10224</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10224</guid>
		<description>Joe,

Caesars, Borgata, and now the Taj mostly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Caesars, Borgata, and now the Taj mostly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdk050507</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10223</link>
		<dc:creator>jdk050507</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10223</guid>
		<description>Ed,
Where in AC do you normally play, if I can ask?  I play there occasionally.  I wouldn&#039;t be hunting you down!....but It would be cool to run into you.
-Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,<br />
Where in AC do you normally play, if I can ask?  I play there occasionally.  I wouldn&#8217;t be hunting you down!&#8230;.but It would be cool to run into you.<br />
-Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vampirion</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10222</link>
		<dc:creator>vampirion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10222</guid>
		<description>Well, i guess in France, the rake is monstruous.
In a 2€-2€ NL game :
2€ if the pot reaches 10
4€ if the pot reaches 50
6€ if the pot reaches 100 + 2€ for the jackpot
8€ if the pot reaches 200
10€ if the pot reaches 300
and so on, capped to 14€ when the pot reaches 500€.
In a 2€-4€ NL game : 
2€ if the pot reaches 10
4€ if the pot reaches 50
6€ if the pot reaches 100 + 2€ for the jackpot
8€ if the pot reaches 200
10€ if the pot reaches 300
and so on, capped to 24€ when the pot reaches 1000€.
Fot the 5€-5€ NL game, it&#039;s a 25€ per person time rake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i guess in France, the rake is monstruous.<br />
In a 2€-2€ NL game :<br />
2€ if the pot reaches 10<br />
4€ if the pot reaches 50<br />
6€ if the pot reaches 100 + 2€ for the jackpot<br />
8€ if the pot reaches 200<br />
10€ if the pot reaches 300<br />
and so on, capped to 14€ when the pot reaches 500€.<br />
In a 2€-4€ NL game :<br />
2€ if the pot reaches 10<br />
4€ if the pot reaches 50<br />
6€ if the pot reaches 100 + 2€ for the jackpot<br />
8€ if the pot reaches 200<br />
10€ if the pot reaches 300<br />
and so on, capped to 24€ when the pot reaches 1000€.<br />
Fot the 5€-5€ NL game, it&#8217;s a 25€ per person time rake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SelfMade</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html/comment-page-1#comment-10218</link>
		<dc:creator>SelfMade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-87-rake-and-time-charges-and-how-they-affect-winning-players.html#comment-10218</guid>
		<description>Correction to above post: the bots&#039; best game is heads-up LIMIT Hold&#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction to above post: the bots&#8217; best game is heads-up LIMIT Hold&#8217;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

