Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Q&A #53: Blind Stealing and Blind Defense – An Overview

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Blind stealing and blind defense. What hands should I do it with? Should I do it more shorthanded? What factors affect whether I try a blind steal or whether I defend my blind. These questions are extremely common. I get asked them in many forms. Unfortunately, a complete answer could fill a book, and it’s not a book I’m particularly inclined to write.

Instead, I’ll offer an overview here and continue the discussion in future posts. I already plan a post about playing the blinds in a short stack situation. If you’re interested in short stack play, read this article. While it’s not exclusively about short stack play, the ideas will nevertheless be important to you.

So here’s one example of a blind stealing/blind defense question, from Jim:

I do have a question for Ed though concerning full ring to shorthanded blind defense. Does the requirements for blinds steals/defenses change at all between the two games?

The short answer, Jim, is that the requirements do and they don’t change. The short answer is never very informative, is it? How’s this: They don’t change from a theoretical perspective, and they do change from a practical perspective. Not 100% accurate, but close enough. Here’s what I mean.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , ,

12 Responses to “Q&A #53: Blind Stealing and Blind Defense – An Overview”

jamleeco
@ Sun Feb 11, 2007 03:04:25 PM
1

Hi Ed, I hope you’re staying warm.

I’m in a live no-limit game. The person on my right has been there 45 mininutes and been in 4 or 5 hands, won 2 of them with 1 showdown.

There are 4 limpers, he completes sb and I get a free play in bb with J4o. The flop comes QJ4 rainbow. He checks, I bet 7bb’s into a 6bb pot.
All fold to sb and he cr’s me to a total of 22 bb’s, ( so a raise of 15 bb’s into 23 bb pot ).

I have no read except he’s not an idiot or maniac. Of course I think maybe strong queen but wouldn’t he have raised preflop, seemed smallish to be a play at the pot. I think, even though more unlikely with card distribution, QJ ? I admit this took me by surprise.

I am trying in the last 5 months to think more like a no-limit player than the limit player I have been previously. In limit I auto rr here. But I felt like he might be trying to build a big pot. Bottom 2 pair is vulnerable. I am embarassed to say I pussed and folded. ( He had 150 bb’s, I had around 300 bb’s). I hope my weak play was not me stupidly trying to protect my hard won stack.

So I guess my rambling question is a plea for help. How should I play bottom 2 pair in this situation?

Shrike
@ Sun Feb 11, 2007 03:42:08 PM
2

Wow, that is a tight fold! You have position, and you could well have the best hand. Are you really that worried about facing QJ?

Ed Miller
@ Sun Feb 11, 2007 03:45:25 PM
3

I agree that the fold is likely too weak. I think the hand is interesting, and I plan to discuss it sometime in the next few days.

JJS
@ Sun Feb 11, 2007 05:12:49 PM
4

Ed says: “Usually the logic goes like this, ‘The blinds come around a lot more often, so each hand costs a lot more to play. If I keep playing tight, I’ll just get blinded out, so I need to start playing a lot more hands to compensate.’ That ‘logic’ is severely flawed.”

This is yet another reason why it’s bad to try to learn about poker by watching it on TV. Just about all of the TV commentators I have seen preach that flawed logic.

jamleeco
@ Sun Feb 11, 2007 08:56:02 PM
5

Ed and Shrike, Yeah, I stewed for the next half hour. I felt like I couldn’t think fast enough and monsters under the bed weakass fold. No, in my mind QJ or 44 didn’t seem that likely.

One thing I at least think I have noticed in my no-limit conversion is that I get a free play in big blind, flop what appears to be decent hand with a hand I normally would never play, and then get my ass lit up. Or not win much.

So I was taken by surprise, made a fold I probably have never made before, felt like a puss and thus have posted this with my shame on open display. I wondered if I should have gone for cr myself but I don’t like to get cute with bottom 2.

I guess my rushed faulty thinking was I couldn’t put what seemed like a tight player check-raising with a weaker hand than my bottom 2. But yes, I felt the flushed cheeks of weak-tight self-humiliation immediately after.

Ed Miller
@ Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:19:35 AM
6

Well, don’t feel too bad about it. No limit requires you to make “weak” folds like that at times. I just don’t think this was quite the right time. Specifically, I think it’s too likely your opponent had a queen or some draw to just give up. Remember, it’s a limped pot, and the only aggression thus far is your flop bet in a QJ4 board. If you had AQ (a very reasonable limping hand for the small blind), would you think you were behind at this point?

jamleeco
@ Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:40:40 AM
7

No, I wouldn’t, come to think of it. I was trying to resolve differences with limit and thought why not bet out a nice bet,you don’t need cr to protect your hand. would that hand be strong enough to chance letting in 3 or 4 before check-raising.

I was trying the unfamiliar process of thinking who is most likely to go broke here.

I feel I should have come back over the top. I still feel calling would have been the worst of the 3, but maybe not.

As a bonus, could you give me an example of a prudent ‘weak fold’ in no-limit.

Thanks Ed.

As you can see i am looking at the calendar everyday awaiting the release of your new book. I’m very excited. In the meantime, variance has been sweet to me I am winning a fair rate. Hopefully your book will be out before “live by the variance, die by the variance” has a chance at me.

Daniel
@ Mon Feb 12, 2007 05:35:07 AM
8

Hi,
I´ve been playing a lot in very tight fullring limit games lately, where many players are have a VPIP 16-20%.
So I am wondering mainly, at what position can I start stealing? When I can be relatively shure that the people behind ar all quite unskilled defenders, which means they probably defend with not much more then 10% of their hands. So there my standard is to start off at MP3 with something like every Ace, K8o+, QT+, every pocket pair and loosen up some more when approaching the Button. Could I steal even more? Or is it to way loose to start stealing with almost half the table yet to act?

despair
@ Mon Feb 12, 2007 01:18:06 PM
9

you could have put this in one liner like it depends…but good read nonethereless, maiby some ranges you would take would be more usefull

uDevil
@ Mon Feb 12, 2007 09:26:00 PM
10

Ed,

Thanks for addressing to this topic. Check your tip jar.

Chris
@ Thu Sep 20, 2007 08:01:46 AM
11

“Now you can definitely play short-stacked very profitably in a 6-handed game. In fact, it may be even MORE profitable in 6-handed than in 10-handed. You just have to loosen up from the standards in GSIH. I’ll give more specifics in a future post.”

Any idea when this future will come to pass? ;-)

Phil Ivey
@ Thu Feb 26, 2009 10:14:22 PM
12

I would of folded :)

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>