Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Q&A #47: Las Vegas or Los Angeles – Where’s the Poker Better?

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

The Scientist asks,Las Vegas

Las Vegas or Los Angeles…Malmuth deals with the question; I’m hoping you will help start a discussion on this or simply render an opinion.

With no real metrics, I am unable to decide which is more viable for cash, players, (skilled and amateur), action.

Skill Level:

On the surface, Los Angeles, the Commerce and the Bike – in that order – for skill – am I fooling myself. On any given night the pop-stars of Poker are there.

Most of the other casinos seem to mere imitations of what?

I ask others (alleged pros or one-time pros – no names) in Los Angeles; they tell me stay in Los Angeles.

Action:

It’s clearly Vegas – more going on – more casinos to choose from – and hey it seems to be good enough for the “big boys”….are you guys trying to keep us out by telling us, Los Angeles is better.

Looking for an “ED” ucated opinion.

If you want to play live poker for a living, you have a few major options of places to live. Two of the most prominent of those options are Los Angeles and Las Vegas.

Las Vegas has tons of cardrooms, but the large majority of them are relatively small in number of tables and relatively small in stakes. You’ll find limit games up to maybe $6-$12 and no limit games of $1-$2 and maybe $2-$5. So it may seem like you have a panoply of options, but the reality is that many of the cardrooms leave little to choose between one another, and few spread games bigger than those I mentioned above. If you want to play $5-$10 NL or $10-$20 or higher limit, on any given day you may have your choice of only three or four rooms and only perhaps five or fewer games at your chose limit in the whole city.

LA has relatively few cardrooms (compared to Vegas), but they are “barns.” They tend to have enormous numbers of tables. Granted, most of these tables are low stakes tables, but a couple of the rooms also have major sections of higher limit games.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Q&A #47: Las Vegas or Los Angeles – Where’s the Poker Better?”

Jay
@ Sat Jan 13, 2007 05:22:37 PM
1

Interesting
have you played at the live at the bike webcast Ed?

Scientist
@ Sat Jan 13, 2007 11:02:36 PM
2

Thank you – and from my limited experience – you are correct. Need I say more; except thank you.

The Commerce and the Bike and Hawaiian Gardens have increased numerous spreads in NL. They even have a NL $20 Buy-in; the blinds so small I can’t remember them. Riding those tables is like a roller coaster.

Aside from the “rake” issue (that is can the rake be beaten in the lowest of limits; different experts weigh-in differently on this one) it seems like playing the lowest tables is like walking on razor blades (straight up). OUCH!

Smoozing time. Hey Ed (Mr. Miller) you’re work is paramount; no disrespect to D. Sklansky because you made him readable. I am literally going through all your work and his with a microscope.

I eagerly await the next book – I find “No Limit Hold’em: Theory and Practice” good, but more like a chemistry course, rather than a Unified Field Theory. I have a feeling (I am hoping) the next one is more Einsteinian in nature.

Once again thank you for your reply,
See you at the tables,
The Scientist.
:)

gabe
@ Sun Jan 14, 2007 01:17:35 AM
3

hi ed,

i agree with most of what you said, but a few years ago when i was playing a lot of limit in both los angeles and las Vegas, i preferred las vegas. this might be a grass is greener thing, but what i liked about las vegas was that the players were more predictable. the los angeles players were looser, though.

yeah, why exactly don’t you live in los angeles?

gabe

So Cal Lurker
@ Sun Jan 14, 2007 04:35:22 AM
4

I can think of a couple of reasons. Traffic being #1.

That fixed buyin NL game is pretty standard at Commerce and HG. I’ve never played at the Bike or HP so I don’t know. The players are bad enough it’s still profitable, but it’s not a good way to play NL.

Ed Miller
@ Wed Jan 17, 2007 06:39:30 PM
5

Gabe,

I may end up in LA yet.

Eric
@ Mon Jan 22, 2007 06:14:40 AM
6

why is the $2/3 NL game a bad structure? Is it unbeatable?

DaveAC
@ Mon Aug 13, 2007 05:44:23 AM
7

As an East Coast Atlantic City player, it seems that all the good action seems to be on the “left coast”. What bugs me though, is that every time I hear discussions about game structures in LA, its always a ridiculous blind-buyin ratio.
2/3 $100 max? 2/5 $200 max? There are others, but these blind structures just dont show up anywhere where I play. 150 BB is the standard 1/2 max buyin anywhere in the north atlantic, and 2/5 games are either $500 or $1000 max. You wont find too many uncapped games at the lower blind levels, but generally the games are deepstacked relative to the LA games. I find that the players here are perhaps less affluent, but just as bad. There isnt much to do in AC but gamble or get killed at a motel, but for a part-time pro, it seems just fine. Ive been itching to make a Commerce/Bike trip at some point, but I really dont know if I’ll like those games as much…

ExMember
@ Thu Sep 27, 2007 04:35:12 PM
8

$2/$3 blinds, $100 max buy-in and $3/5 blinds with $200 max buy-in are standard in Los Angeles county. The $4 or $5 drop (depending on where you play) is expensive, but doesn’t make either game unbeatable.

Going bigger, $5/$5 blinds with $300-$500 buy-in is available at the Bike. $5/$10 blinds at Commerce has a $400 max buy-in. That’s an awful structure but the game gets big fast. When I last played three players at the table had more than $2500.

Uncapped games are the rule going up from there, $5/$10 blind $500 min buy-in pretty much everyday at the Bike. $10/$20 blinds $600 min buy-in at Commerce continually.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>