Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Q&A #41: Playing the Turn Out of Position

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Matt asks,

Here is a hand I played earlier today. I won the hand, but it was a bad beat. Did I get too “cute”?

Full Tilt 2/4 Limit Hold’em Ring (7 handed)

Preflop: Hero is LP with 7 :heart: 7 :spade: .
2 folds, Hero raises, CO (poster) calls, Button raises, 2 folds, Hero calls, CO (poster) calls

Flop: (10.50 SB) 3 :diamond: 9 :club: 4 :heart: (3 players)
Hero checks, CO (poster) checks, Button bets, Hero raises, 1 fold, Button raises, Hero calls

Turn: (8.75 BB) 6 :club: (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets, Hero raises, Button calls

River: (12.75 BB) 5 :spade: (2 players)
Hero bets, Button calls

Final Pot: $55 ($2 rake)

Results below:
LP has 7 :heart: 7 :spade: (a straight, Seven high)
Button has K :diamond: K :heart: (a pair of Kings)
Outcome: Hero wins $55

Some important information:
The CO is new to the game and has just posted a late-position blind. The button is a good player who I’ve been playing with a lot lately. I’ve been involved in a lot of pots with her and won most of them through aggressive play. She has recently started to play back at me, although she will still fold if I show a lot of strength.

Here is how I thought about the hand: Since the cutoff had posted a late-position blind, the button may have interpreted my raise as a pure steal. Therefore, she could have been three-betting (preflop) with a lot of hands, many of which missed the flop. Do you think check-raising was the right play? Calling her three-bet on the flop seemed correct, given the large pot. I’m not so sure about my play on the turn. Again, she’s folded against this type of play in the past. I’m really confused about this hand and eager to hear your thoughts.

Hands like this one really are the first places where many players graduate from weak-tight, fit-or-fold poker into a more solid game. I think you’re thinking in the right direction, but I wouldn’t have played it quite the way you did.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Q&A #41: Playing the Turn Out of Position”

Matt
@ Thu Dec 21, 2006 02:36:11 PM
1

Thanks, Ed! Everything you say makes perfect sense. I knew deep-down that I overplayed the hand. However, it’s easy to pat yourself on the back when you play badly and get lucky. I’m trying to control that tendency.

Thanks again,
Matt

PeterL
@ Thu Dec 21, 2006 05:54:00 PM
2

I am interested in your comment about graduating with hands like this and I have found I tend to now peel of a card after the flop with PP when the pot is bigger than usual, and even sometimes on a small pot when the other players always pay simply for the implied odds if i hit the turn,

Am I out of line here as I only have 2 outs about 4% chance of hitting but when i do hit I tend to take down a very large pot.

As it is a recent change in my play that I have thought about a lot I would value opinions on it.

Thanks
Peter

Anonymous
@ Sat Dec 23, 2006 05:28:27 PM
3

good read

Jose
@ Fri Feb 09, 2007 05:06:06 PM
4

When I have a small pocket pair preflop, I’m usually hoping to make trips on the flop. If I don’t make trips on the flop, and the pocket pair is small (meaning, its only value was to make trips) then, my play is pretty straight forward, I look at the implied odds. If implied odds are better than 1 to 22, then I call, if not I fold without hesitation. In my experience, it is extremely rare to see implied odds of 1 to 22 preflop, so I almost never call a single bet on the flop to see if I make a set.
Obviously, as the pair gets stronger (in comparison to the flop) or if the flop is such that it gives you more draws then again I count the outs (or partial outs) to make the draw and look at the implied odds to decide whether to stay in the hand or fold.
Thats essentially how I approach pocket pairs.
I read some posts where someone calls a bet on the flop with a small pocket pair when the pot is large. But to me, the pot has to be, not just large but humongous (at least around 20 SB, maybe a little smaller if a lot of players are still in the pot, bottom line hoping that the final pot will be at least 22 SB) for me to call 1 bet.
I think otherwise, I’d be calling to much. If you read SSHE Winning Big with Expert Play or I’m sure LHE for begginers, those explain this topic much better.

Kyle
@ Mon Mar 26, 2007 08:45:44 AM
5

Just going through the archives, I found this blog that I had not read yet.

I agree with Ed’s thinking all the way to the part that he says he would bet the turn against a player who is more likely to have just overcards. We have to take into account that we picked up a gutshot + our two outs to improve + we still aren’t 100 percent sure that we’re beat, and we’re not going to find out until we get popped again or we see the showdown. So with no outs or 2 outs, Ed, are you bet folding the turn? With your gutshot are you bet-calling, check folding the river? Or is the gutshot possiblity something you overlooked in your thinking that you would bet the turn against this sort of player.

With extra outs on the turn and still some doubt, I don’t want put in two bets here on the turn, I’d still check and call.

USA
@ Sun Jul 22, 2007 11:06:14 PM
6

“weak-tight” is a nickname that donkeys(or people who suckout big time with their 4% chance to win) give good players. It’s kind of a mental distortion that comes from being a jerk. Good means “weak” to them. BTW, Matt lives in a little tiny apartment in Las Vegas, so he’s not that good at poker, so you shouldn’t take his advice too heavily.

USA
@ Sun Jul 22, 2007 11:07:34 PM
7

correction: not “matt”, I ment Ed Miller. See, he’s so small I can’t even remember his name.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>