<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&amp;A #118: Suited Connectors Vs. Pocket Aces And The Confusion About Limping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-118-suited-connectors-vs-pocket-aces-and-the-confusion-about-limping.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-118-suited-connectors-vs-pocket-aces-and-the-confusion-about-limping.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Suited Connectors: The Busters &#124; Poker Action Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-118-suited-connectors-vs-pocket-aces-and-the-confusion-about-limping.html/comment-page-1#comment-14687</link>
		<dc:creator>Suited Connectors: The Busters &#124; Poker Action Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=640#comment-14687</guid>
		<description>[...] Q&amp;A #118: Suited Connectors Vs. Pocket Aces And The Confusion &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Q&amp;A #118: Suited Connectors Vs. Pocket Aces And The Confusion &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Attenborough</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-118-suited-connectors-vs-pocket-aces-and-the-confusion-about-limping.html/comment-page-1#comment-14433</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Attenborough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=640#comment-14433</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the response Ed, I wasn&#039;t expecting that and I really appreciate your response. I&#039;ve been having a bit of a tough time at the tables recently so I&#039;m trying to take the pressure off myself a bit by playing less and trying to develop some other interests beside poker. But it&#039;s always good to know people are interested in what you have to say. Keep up the good work here and at Stoxpoker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response Ed, I wasn&#8217;t expecting that and I really appreciate your response. I&#8217;ve been having a bit of a tough time at the tables recently so I&#8217;m trying to take the pressure off myself a bit by playing less and trying to develop some other interests beside poker. But it&#8217;s always good to know people are interested in what you have to say. Keep up the good work here and at Stoxpoker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karbyn</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-118-suited-connectors-vs-pocket-aces-and-the-confusion-about-limping.html/comment-page-1#comment-14421</link>
		<dc:creator>karbyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=640#comment-14421</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more Ed.  They likely remember the times they lost huge pots with AA to SCs and the huge pots they won with SCs vs AA.  They just forget all the medium and large pots that went the AA way.  Nevermind all the pots that never went to a showdown, where the SC folded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more Ed.  They likely remember the times they lost huge pots with AA to SCs and the huge pots they won with SCs vs AA.  They just forget all the medium and large pots that went the AA way.  Nevermind all the pots that never went to a showdown, where the SC folded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
