<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poker Combination Calculation Exercise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hgfn klksds</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-15896</link>
		<dc:creator>hgfn klksds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-15896</guid>
		<description>http://www.838dz.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.838dz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.838dz.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David N. Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-15641</link>
		<dc:creator>David N. Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-15641</guid>
		<description>i have a question. in hold-em, one player has royal flush, the other full house. how many combos are there to get this reasults ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have a question. in hold-em, one player has royal flush, the other full house. how many combos are there to get this reasults ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skipatore</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12923</link>
		<dc:creator>Skipatore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12923</guid>
		<description>Hairsplitter&#039;s finest hour: Exposed burn cards. If a dealer exposes and burns the AH we have six variations of AAA KK full house board chops. And Dude, let&#039;s not forget, let&#039;s not forget how many (20) cards in the deck, as the exposed burn, can&#039;t complete royal flushes that otherwise hafta chop.(That ain&#039;t legal either.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hairsplitter&#8217;s finest hour: Exposed burn cards. If a dealer exposes and burns the AH we have six variations of AAA KK full house board chops. And Dude, let&#8217;s not forget, let&#8217;s not forget how many (20) cards in the deck, as the exposed burn, can&#8217;t complete royal flushes that otherwise hafta chop.(That ain&#8217;t legal either.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabadam</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12922</link>
		<dc:creator>fabadam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 08:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12922</guid>
		<description>@jamleeco:
360 3-flushes is correct. I had &quot;grunched&quot; my answer (mot looking at any answer prior).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jamleeco:<br />
360 3-flushes is correct. I had &#8220;grunched&#8221; my answer (mot looking at any answer prior).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BadBeatExpert</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12918</link>
		<dc:creator>BadBeatExpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12918</guid>
		<description>I used weasel97&#039;s method for calculating the number of straights without flush possibilities (600).  Adding in the royal flushes and quads, I also get 656 nut boards, just like weasel97 and Toonces, the driving cat.  That means only 0.0252% of boards fulfill this criterion.  

I guess the lesson is that we shouldn&#039;t be overly eager to call when we see someone make a big bet on a board with a big made hand (such as a straight) -- it&#039;s very possible that it&#039;s a value bet.

Also, let me add that I&#039;m impressed by all of your replies.  I hope NOT to see you playing against me in my crappy pokerstars 3.40 SnGs and 25NL games. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used weasel97&#8242;s method for calculating the number of straights without flush possibilities (600).  Adding in the royal flushes and quads, I also get 656 nut boards, just like weasel97 and Toonces, the driving cat.  That means only 0.0252% of boards fulfill this criterion.  </p>
<p>I guess the lesson is that we shouldn&#8217;t be overly eager to call when we see someone make a big bet on a board with a big made hand (such as a straight) &#8212; it&#8217;s very possible that it&#8217;s a value bet.</p>
<p>Also, let me add that I&#8217;m impressed by all of your replies.  I hope NOT to see you playing against me in my crappy pokerstars 3.40 SnGs and 25NL games. <img src='http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamleeco</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12915</link>
		<dc:creator>jamleeco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12915</guid>
		<description>I just read all the comments. I took the same approcah as Weasel and came up with same answer.

However, since I usually play on weekdays and stayed home from casino today for new showerdoor installation guy, I am supposed to have been cleaning house thus far.

Thanks Ed. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read all the comments. I took the same approcah as Weasel and came up with same answer.</p>
<p>However, since I usually play on weekdays and stayed home from casino today for new showerdoor installation guy, I am supposed to have been cleaning house thus far.</p>
<p>Thanks Ed. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamleeco</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12913</link>
		<dc:creator>jamleeco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12913</guid>
		<description>Fadaham,

 I keep coming up with 360 3-flushes. The missing 2 card combinations to broadways =10. 

There are 9 ways this can occur without making a 4 flush. The scenario for each of the 4 suits in the 3 flush, and I get 360 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fadaham,</p>
<p> I keep coming up with 360 3-flushes. The missing 2 card combinations to broadways =10. </p>
<p>There are 9 ways this can occur without making a 4 flush. The scenario for each of the 4 suits in the 3 flush, and I get 360 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabadam</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12909</link>
		<dc:creator>fabadam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12909</guid>
		<description>What boards apply and how many:
 * Royal flushes: there are 4, one in each suit
 * Rainbow top straights: AKQJT, no three of each suit. There&#039;s 480 of those (see below).
 * xxxxA quads (LOL Kristy Gazes) = 4 x 12 = 48
 * AAAAK = 4

Why 480 straights? AKQJT can come up in 4^5=1024 ways. But not counting are:
 (*) 4 royals
 (*) 60 4-flushes
 (*) 480 3-flushes

So there are 4+480+48+4 = 536 nut boards.

The total number of boards is 52x51x50x49x48/5x4x3x2x1 = 2,598,960

So the percentage of nut boards is: 
 536 / 2,598,960 = 0.0206236 %
That&#039;s about one in every 2 in every 10,000 boards. Which means I should have seen about 50 in my lifetime now, but it seems much more ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What boards apply and how many:<br />
 * Royal flushes: there are 4, one in each suit<br />
 * Rainbow top straights: AKQJT, no three of each suit. There&#8217;s 480 of those (see below).<br />
 * xxxxA quads (LOL Kristy Gazes) = 4 x 12 = 48<br />
 * AAAAK = 4</p>
<p>Why 480 straights? AKQJT can come up in 4^5=1024 ways. But not counting are:<br />
 (*) 4 royals<br />
 (*) 60 4-flushes<br />
 (*) 480 3-flushes</p>
<p>So there are 4+480+48+4 = 536 nut boards.</p>
<p>The total number of boards is 52x51x50x49x48/5x4x3x2x1 = 2,598,960</p>
<p>So the percentage of nut boards is:<br />
 536 / 2,598,960 = 0.0206236 %<br />
That&#8217;s about one in every 2 in every 10,000 boards. Which means I should have seen about 50 in my lifetime now, but it seems much more ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12908</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 20:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12908</guid>
		<description>I think the way to calculate it is much easier. You only have to calculate the broadways straights which is 4^5. This gives us all the A-T combinations including royal flushes): 1024 possibilities. The rest are quads with the nut kicker:  kings to deuces with an ace: 12*4. plus Aces with a king: 4 more hands. summa summarum 1076 hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the way to calculate it is much easier. You only have to calculate the broadways straights which is 4^5. This gives us all the A-T combinations including royal flushes): 1024 possibilities. The rest are quads with the nut kicker:  kings to deuces with an ace: 12*4. plus Aces with a king: 4 more hands. summa summarum 1076 hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html/comment-page-1#comment-12906</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/poker-math/poker-combination-calculation-exercise.html#comment-12906</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the spam filter, guys. It&#039;s got a high false positive rate (and sometimes lets genuine spam through too). If I get rid of it the site will be filled with spam, but I could look into a captcha-style replacement I suppose.

For now, whenever I get a chance, I go through the spam filter and unspam all the good comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the spam filter, guys. It&#8217;s got a high false positive rate (and sometimes lets genuine spam through too). If I get rid of it the site will be filled with spam, but I could look into a captcha-style replacement I suppose.</p>
<p>For now, whenever I get a chance, I go through the spam filter and unspam all the good comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

