Comments on: The Squeeze Play http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-squeeze-play.html Training poker players into professional players Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:36:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: SteveO http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-squeeze-play.html/comment-page-1#comment-12894 SteveO Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:23:51 +0000 http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/the-squeeze-play.html#comment-12894 Is the squeeze play even better when you are squeezing WITH position? That way, the initial raiser has one less reason to call - i.e. he won't even have position. Is the squeeze play even better when you are squeezing WITH position? That way, the initial raiser has one less reason to call – i.e. he won’t even have position.

]]> By: [MPF] MentalPolyphonics.com » Countdown to the Main Event http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-squeeze-play.html/comment-page-1#comment-12861 [MPF] MentalPolyphonics.com » Countdown to the Main Event Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:02:03 +0000 http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/the-squeeze-play.html#comment-12861 [...] calling he sweetens the pot if the first player wants to call and creates a prime opportunity for a squeeze play, which is what Adamic [...] [...] calling he sweetens the pot if the first player wants to call and creates a prime opportunity for a squeeze play, which is what Adamic [...]

]]> By: Nico http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-squeeze-play.html/comment-page-1#comment-12850 Nico Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:11:11 +0000 http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/the-squeeze-play.html#comment-12850 "The call-reraise play on a 6-6-5 flop was unmistakably a huge hand: a full house" Full house? Really? “The call-reraise play on a 6-6-5 flop was unmistakably a huge hand: a full house”

Full house? Really?

]]> By: Steve Boyd http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-squeeze-play.html/comment-page-1#comment-12844 Steve Boyd Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:00:47 +0000 http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/the-squeeze-play.html#comment-12844 I see something close to this play a lot in NL10. 7 people will limp and then one of the blinds will raise pre-flop to about 7-9BB (2-5bb is a standard raise) and the entire table folds virtually everytime. And even if there are any call, c-bets tend to be far stronger when the bet is a decent chunk of your stack. I see something close to this play a lot in NL10. 7 people will limp and then one of the blinds will raise pre-flop to about 7-9BB (2-5bb is a standard raise) and the entire table folds virtually everytime.

And even if there are any call, c-bets tend to be far stronger when the bet is a decent chunk of your stack.

]]> By: SelfMade http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-squeeze-play.html/comment-page-1#comment-12837 SelfMade Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:20:07 +0000 http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/the-squeeze-play.html#comment-12837 Isn't it $140 to win $105? Not quite as good odds. Isn’t it $140 to win $105? Not quite as good odds.

]]> By: jamleeco http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-squeeze-play.html/comment-page-1#comment-12822 jamleeco Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:27:04 +0000 http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/the-squeeze-play.html#comment-12822 You meant the $150 to be $110, right? Not vice versa. You meant the $150 to be $110, right? Not vice versa.

]]>