Hand Discussion #5: My Thoughts
Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.
All articles older than 30 days have been made temporarily unavailable. This article will be available again soon as premium content. In the meantime, please visit the main page to read all the most recent posts.
Also be sure to check out Stoxpoker, Professional Poker Training. Joining is easy, and your membership entitles you to watch hundreds of hours of poker training videos. Try Stoxpoker out right now! Watch a FREE 3 minute demo of any Stoxpoker video!
Tags: absolute-position, bluffing, drawing-hands, flush-draw, hand-discussion, las-vegas, no-limit-holdem, relative-position, thin-value-bet, value-betIf you find this article helpful please support the site to help keep the poker strategy tips coming.

Thanks for your remarks, Ed. I just wanted to make sure I wasn’t totally on crack.
I think my crucial error was that I didn’t think of my hand as strong on the turn. I felt I had a mediocre hand. If I made a decent bet, I’m now playing for a big pot on the river if I miss. It didn’t occur to me that my hand was actually pretty strong and I could avoid the issue of having to play a big pot on the river by moving in on the turn. It makes sense now that you’ve explained it.
As it turns out, opponent called and had ATo, so I lost. The opponent played this hand very strangely–making a very dangerous PFR, betting into seven players when he had nothing, checking when he hit his best possible card, and then check-calling on the river. The only thing I could think of is that he must’ve thought I was sandbagging an overpair–like Jacks or Queens. He didn’t seem savvy enough to induce a bluff, but he very well could’ve been trying for that. Otherwise, his play of this hand made no sense to me at all.
Thanks for your help.