<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hand Discussion #13: Out Of Position With Top Pair</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Optisizier</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13223</link>
		<dc:creator>Optisizier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13223</guid>
		<description>@ Declan:
So what is resistance to you?
That he 4-bets you and you have to fold? So then you &quot;know&quot; you folded to AK, AA or a bluff...
That he just calls your 3-bet, is that too &quot;resistance&quot;? So then you know you are playing this hand, which you have made way too big at this stage, against AK, AA or a bluff...
How does all this help you any?
I say, although this situation is &quot;tough&quot; is it a standard one that you cannot shy away from if you want to take your game to the next level...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Declan:<br />
So what is resistance to you?<br />
That he 4-bets you and you have to fold? So then you &#8220;know&#8221; you folded to AK, AA or a bluff&#8230;<br />
That he just calls your 3-bet, is that too &#8220;resistance&#8221;? So then you know you are playing this hand, which you have made way too big at this stage, against AK, AA or a bluff&#8230;<br />
How does all this help you any?<br />
I say, although this situation is &#8220;tough&#8221; is it a standard one that you cannot shy away from if you want to take your game to the next level&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13219</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 09:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13219</guid>
		<description>you made a strong play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you made a strong play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Declan McKenna</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13215</link>
		<dc:creator>Declan McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 17:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13215</guid>
		<description>This is a tough situation, I would prefer not to get into it in the first place by 3betting preflop.

I&#039;m out of position and I haven&#039;t narrowed my opponents range down. At least if I 3bet and I meet resistance I know I don&#039;t have them outkicked and am up against AK, AA or a bluff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tough situation, I would prefer not to get into it in the first place by 3betting preflop.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m out of position and I haven&#8217;t narrowed my opponents range down. At least if I 3bet and I meet resistance I know I don&#8217;t have them outkicked and am up against AK, AA or a bluff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threads13</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13208</link>
		<dc:creator>threads13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 06:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13208</guid>
		<description>Guys,

I think he will check behind the river some portion of the time with his aces and definitely with his mid pair hands.  I don&#039;t want to see that happen because I think he calls with both of those hands a higher portion of the time when he bets the flop.

In the example where the flop is checked around I am assuming that we bet the turn and get called by the preflop raiser.  In that case I would be more apt to check the river when the draws miss than if he were to bet the flop because I read him to have a busted draw a much higher percentage of the time.  

In general, I like betting the river OOP unless I have a really good read that the guy will bluff and stuff like that because I think most players will make more calls on the river with hands than I beat than they will bluff hands that I beat(and check behind hands that I beat and then I&#039;m missing value).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys,</p>
<p>I think he will check behind the river some portion of the time with his aces and definitely with his mid pair hands.  I don&#8217;t want to see that happen because I think he calls with both of those hands a higher portion of the time when he bets the flop.</p>
<p>In the example where the flop is checked around I am assuming that we bet the turn and get called by the preflop raiser.  In that case I would be more apt to check the river when the draws miss than if he were to bet the flop because I read him to have a busted draw a much higher percentage of the time.  </p>
<p>In general, I like betting the river OOP unless I have a really good read that the guy will bluff and stuff like that because I think most players will make more calls on the river with hands than I beat than they will bluff hands that I beat(and check behind hands that I beat and then I&#8217;m missing value).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13207</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 05:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13207</guid>
		<description>...snip...
The biggest tragedy here would MP having a better hand, taking SB’s stack, then SB leaves the table and we never see him again.
...snip...

Well said sir, well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;snip&#8230;<br />
The biggest tragedy here would MP having a better hand, taking SB’s stack, then SB leaves the table and we never see him again.<br />
&#8230;snip&#8230;</p>
<p>Well said sir, well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13206</guid>
		<description>Todd,

I agree completely with you. The only reason I want to check raise the flop is to drive out the MP knowing he would only do so with a worse hand. I&#039;m not interested in his money at all, its the SB I&#039;m after. With MP safely out of the picture, I&#039;m more comfortable committing against the SB.

Yes the MP can punish us, even with a worse hand, that&#039;s the value of position, but that&#039;s also why I wanted to 3 bet him preflop- to try driving him out cheaper.

As I said, if MP calls my flop check/raise, that would tell me he has a better hand, and I&#039;m check-folding the Turn unimproved.

The biggest tragedy here would MP having a better hand, taking SB&#039;s stack, then SB leaves the table and we never see him again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>I agree completely with you. The only reason I want to check raise the flop is to drive out the MP knowing he would only do so with a worse hand. I&#8217;m not interested in his money at all, its the SB I&#8217;m after. With MP safely out of the picture, I&#8217;m more comfortable committing against the SB.</p>
<p>Yes the MP can punish us, even with a worse hand, that&#8217;s the value of position, but that&#8217;s also why I wanted to 3 bet him preflop- to try driving him out cheaper.</p>
<p>As I said, if MP calls my flop check/raise, that would tell me he has a better hand, and I&#8217;m check-folding the Turn unimproved.</p>
<p>The biggest tragedy here would MP having a better hand, taking SB&#8217;s stack, then SB leaves the table and we never see him again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13204</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13204</guid>
		<description>Hi Threads,

If it goes check/call, check/check I generally prefer to check/call the river against an aggressive villain.  We have a good hand against his range and the villain will rep an A so often with that line even if he doesn&#039;t have it.  I really think most A&#039;s are going to try to get two streets of value.  It would be very hard for him to put us on AQ.  I think I probably check to induce too much, though.

Are you thinking that he is going to check behind on the river if we don&#039;t bet with his weaker A&#039;s and 2nd pair hands?  I think this is a matter of balancing the times he would bet with air vs the times he would check behind with 2nd pair on the river, but would still call a bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Threads,</p>
<p>If it goes check/call, check/check I generally prefer to check/call the river against an aggressive villain.  We have a good hand against his range and the villain will rep an A so often with that line even if he doesn&#8217;t have it.  I really think most A&#8217;s are going to try to get two streets of value.  It would be very hard for him to put us on AQ.  I think I probably check to induce too much, though.</p>
<p>Are you thinking that he is going to check behind on the river if we don&#8217;t bet with his weaker A&#8217;s and 2nd pair hands?  I think this is a matter of balancing the times he would bet with air vs the times he would check behind with 2nd pair on the river, but would still call a bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deryl G</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13202</link>
		<dc:creator>Deryl G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13202</guid>
		<description>threads13,

How did we get to the river?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>threads13,</p>
<p>How did we get to the river?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threads13</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13201</link>
		<dc:creator>threads13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13201</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d much rather bet the river than check-call in this hand unless he checks the flop.  If he checks flop I think that puts his hands towards flush draws more than aces so I think I get more value out of inducing a bluff than getting worse aces, and other worse hands like middle pair, to call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d much rather bet the river than check-call in this hand unless he checks the flop.  If he checks flop I think that puts his hands towards flush draws more than aces so I think I get more value out of inducing a bluff than getting worse aces, and other worse hands like middle pair, to call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deryl G</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/no-limit-hold-em/hand-discussion-13-out-of-position-with-top-pair.html/comment-page-1#comment-13200</link>
		<dc:creator>Deryl G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 19:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=442#comment-13200</guid>
		<description>I said &quot;If it gets check through, I’m bet-folding the turn.&quot;  I&#039;d like to retract that.  Instead I mean this:

If it gets check through, I’m bet-folding the turn on a scare card.  On a safe card I&#039;ll bet-call.  I&#039;m probably check-calling the river either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said &#8220;If it gets check through, I’m bet-folding the turn.&#8221;  I&#8217;d like to retract that.  Instead I mean this:</p>
<p>If it gets check through, I’m bet-folding the turn on a scare card.  On a safe card I&#8217;ll bet-call.  I&#8217;m probably check-calling the river either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

