Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Hand Discussion #11: My Thoughts

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

The comments were great on this blind versus blind no-limit hand. To recap, here’s the action so far:

It’s a $0.50-$1 game, and the villain has $109 (and I have him covered). Everyone folds to me in the small blind, and I make it $3.50 to go with A :diamond: 5 :diamond: . The big blind calls. I would say that the big blind plays in a way that I find fairly common in the 6-max $0.50-$1 games, so he’s not an atypical or bizarre player.

The flop comes 9 :heart: 8 :heart: 6 :spade: . I check, and the big blind checks.

The turn is the 2 :diamond: . I bet $5.50 into the $7 pot, and the big blind calls.

The river is the K :heart: .

Some commenters didn’t like the fact that I raised this hand preflop, checked the flop, and then bet 3/4 pot on the turn. Against a known tough opponent, I agree that this line could leave me a bit vulnerable, since it’s fairly obvious that the deuce didn’t help me, and my range here is generally fairly weak.

But I posted the following comment in the original thread in response to this criticism.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Hand Discussion #11: My Thoughts”

Todd
@ Fri Feb 15, 2008 05:11:46 PM
1

I think I started the whole “I wouldn’t play A5″ business. I qualified it with “if he was sticky”, which I still think is good poker. Given that we don’t think he is, I like the whole line. I particularly like the delayed c-bet. That should be part of everyone’s game. I also really like the bet sizing at the end if you think he’s a single level thinker who will be scared here. Well played.

AKQJ10
@ Fri Feb 15, 2008 10:39:43 PM
2

However, I think the line I took up to the river is completely acceptable in these small games. To the person who said that the turn bet is horrendous… I completely disagree. In fact, I’d be hard-pressed to think of more than one or two situations in the $0.50-$1 games on Full Tilt where I think betting after my opponent checks is ever *horrendous*. Checking in these games shows a lot of weakness, and people also tend to fold when they’re weak rather than look for floats and resteals.

Conversely, I’ve found a great deal of success playing aces in position: check flop, call turn, call river, as long as the board isn’t too scary. It’s essentially pot control on the round that nobody expects it, but it’s quite likely to induce a lot of NL50 opponent to bet inferior hands for two rounds. Of course it carries some risk of of being outdrawn, but most NLHE advantages require some countervailing risk except against terrible players.

threads13
@ Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:48:39 PM
3

Thinking about this hand… If this river wasn’t a heart, A, or K we could have a nice c/r-bluff.

livetower
@ Wed Feb 20, 2008 01:35:53 AM
4

I would follow through w/ bet on flop and give up on turn/river w/ either showdown or fold. I think ur check on flop and bet on turn represents air. i dont think the Kh is scarycard at all. no way i’m giving u credit for flush, and if king hit u then ur range on turn was complete air, or ur holding was very marginal pre. i’m calling u down here with a pretty marginal holding, even though i agree ur pot bet on the river usually represents strength. i think the villain in this spot gives u less credit and will call u down weak too often for this to be a profitable play. this is just my read and i’m playing 3/6 to 10/20 nl so like u said at tougher tables u may change ur line. i would change ur line regardless of being at a “tough” table. gl

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>