Hand Discussion #11: Blind Versus Blind On The River
Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.
I’ve been playing a lot of 6-max $0.25-$0.50 and $0.50-$1 on Full Tilt for the past few months, and I’ve already played dozens and dozens of noteworthy hands. I’m saving most of my interesting hands for analysis in the second volume of Professional No-Limit Hold ‘em. But I wanted to share this hand with you today because I think it should be extra valuable to those of you who play in the same games.
It’s a $0.50-$1 game, and the villain has $109 (and I have him covered). Everyone folds to me in the small blind, and I make it $3.50 to go with A
5
. The big blind calls. I would say that the big blind plays in a way that I find fairly common in the 6-max $0.50-$1 games, so he’s not an atypical or bizarre player.
The flop comes 9
8
6
. I check, and the big blind checks.
The turn is the 2
. I bet $5.50 into the $7 pot, and the big blind calls.
The river is the K
.
What do you think of the play so far? What range of hands do you put the big blind on? What range of hands do you think the big blind puts me on? (I definitely think the big blind is trying to read hands.) What would your plan on the river be and why? You can read my thoughts here.
Tags: Hand Reading, matt-flynn, no-limit-holdem, pnl, poker, professional-no-limit-holdem, river-play, sunny-mehta

This IS a good hand to discuss because its a very common problem, at least for me.
Based on the turn call, I put villain on either a straight or flush draw. A7, 97s, 87s are strong possibilities. There aren’t any hands you beat, and I’m not at all sure you’ve represented the flush by betting on the turn, so a pair might very well call your bet.
I would probably check/fold, but this is coming from a losing no-limit player, so folks’ are likely better off doing the opposite of what I would do.