Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Small Stakes No-Limit Hold’em Excerpt: Ace-Jack Offsuit In The Small Blind

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Here’s another quick excerpt from the new e-book Small Stakes No-Limit Hold’em. This excerpt represents one of the many, many hand examples in the new book. If you haven’t seen it, also check out last week’s excerpt The Light 3-Bet.

Ace-Jack Offsuit In The Small Blind

Stacks are $200. Everyone folds to you in the small blind, and you make it $8 with A :spade: J :heart: . The 29/8 big blind calls. He is a passive player and slightly on the loose side. Keeping in mind that this is a blind versus blind battle, and also that he views you as being fairly aggressive, you expect him to have a fairly wide range of hands here. That means pretty much anything playable, although he would probably have reraised with a premium hand.

The flop comes Q :spade: 8 :club: 5 :diamond: . You c-bet $12 into the $16 pot. He calls. The turn is the K :diamond: . Should you check and give up, or should you fire again?

This is an excellent spot for a second barrel, and you should definitely bet again. Your opponent’s range is weak. He flat called a likely blind steal preflop, and then he called your flop bet on a fairly dry board. His most likely hand is one weak pair or a gutshot. The overcard king is unpleasant for most of the hands in his range. You have good fold equity, and a big turn bet will take down the pot a high percentage of the time.

Players sometimes see the king on the turn and think, “Oh, I picked up a gutshot. And because it’s a scare card, if I check, he’ll probably check and let me draw to my straight for free.” This is another classic example of overestimating implied odds and underestimating fold equity.

It’s true that if you check the turn, he’ll often check behind. So what? That just confirms what you already suspect, which is that his hand is weak. Even if you hit one of your meager four gutshot outs on the river, you don’t stand to make very much money. Further, checking the turn makes it harder to steal on the river when you miss. A checked turn means a smaller pot on the river, which makes it easier for him to call your bluff. Plus, by checking the turn you give him a free card to improve, which would give him another reason to call your river bet.

When your opponents’ ranges are weak, think first about stealing and then about making the best hand. Even when you have some pot equity, don’t ignore your folding equity.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Small Stakes No-Limit Hold’em Excerpt: Ace-Jack Offsuit In The Small Blind”

Tim
@ Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:16:47 PM
1

So if he called your bet on the turn would you fire a third barrel on the river (if a total blank came like 3h)?

Jesus
@ Wed Apr 29, 2009 02:40:29 PM
2

It depends

Tommy C
@ Thu Apr 30, 2009 06:56:09 AM
3

Instead of a passive player you are instead up against a more aggressive opponent. Whose possible actions includes a reraise bluff as well as a betting if we check.

What other attributes of our opponents play would influence your decision?

The call on the flop for this player may have been float in order to steal on subsequent streets.

jim
@ Thu Apr 30, 2009 08:15:40 AM
4

This seems to be at odds with Andrew Brokos’ advice on depolarising your turn range – very similar hands… http://www.thinkingpoker.net/Depolarizing.html... presumably because people aren’t thinking at his level at $200NL but it would be good to hear your response Ed. Thanks.

jim
@ Thu Apr 30, 2009 08:16:24 AM
5

ps you’ll need to remove the periods at the end of the link for it to work

Jimmy
@ Thu Apr 30, 2009 08:58:26 AM
6

Why did Brokos move all in on the turn,if he thinks the guys bluffing then let him bluff the river too,and he’s not gonna get many better hands to fold JJ and maybe some weak Queens.
There is also a big difference in the 2 hands in Brokos’ hand he raises utg+1 and is 3 bet by the BB whereas Ed is in a blind v blind situation against a pretty loose passive player so while the board might be similar the preflop action and pot size are miles apart.

Erik
@ Thu Apr 30, 2009 09:08:27 AM
7

You asked for Ed’s response and I am sure he will, but I thought I would chip in my 2 cents too.

I think the pattern is really similar, but the situation is totally different. First, this is a three bet pot. Second, as you mentioned, this is a higher stakes game. Third, both players are at least TAG like and not a 29/8.

Last, he is playing on that next level because he mentions that it was a good scare card for his opponent to bluff; thus, he is leveling a good player at a higher stakes game.

If I was teaching someone to play and win at lower stakes then teaching them to barrel the scare card on the turn is probably a good lesson and one that has already been learned by most regulars at 5/10.

zulu
@ Tue Jan 19, 2010 05:16:48 PM
8

gigity gigity aight damn yo u people need lifes. I love u nerds terms for everything Poker is a hustle the hustler always wins are minds are better. U see this x this divided by times the square root of pie semetrical to a monkeys bottom equals i make more money then you hahaha. Situations reading ability size of your SACK, hahahaha all over you new breeds of players. by the book players make money but hustlers rule the world quote snoop dogg never nore biznatch peace

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>