| User | Post |
|
7:16 pm November 18, 2007
| Sinclair
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
Hey everyone! I thought I would throw this question out there since I’m a little confused over the idea of "sunk cost."
A hand came up where I spewed off my chips from the button by jamming over the CO with A8s and ~ 14BBs. He had been raising very aggressively and he had folded to raises in previous hands so I’m still undecided about that play (although in the long run it probably isn’t very good).
However, afterwards I had a discussion with a friend of mine about the play. I said I should be more inclined to shove if I was in the BB rather than the button facing a CO open.
He said he would rather shove from the button b/c he wins more due to the blinds in the pot.
I said yeah, but there are also two more players behind you when you shove from the button and it costs less to shove from the BB.
Then we became confused in discussing this last point and the term “sunk cost” was brought up or whatever.
So here is my question:
All else equal, does it cost less to shove from the BB as opposed to the Button over a CO raise
|
|
|
7:32 pm November 18, 2007
| Ed Miller
Admin
| | | |
|
| posts 162 |
|
|
I think it’s clearly the BB. The two fewer opponents are the difference. Since the BB money is already in the pot (the "sunk cost" you are talking about) you are often getting very similar odds.
For instance, say the CO opens for 3BB and you have 13BB total. Shoving for 13BB more gives you a chance to win the CO’s 3 plus the 1.5 from the blinds.
If you have 13BB total in the big blind, you’re risking 12BB more for the chance to win the CO’s 3 plus the 1.5 from the blinds. It’s not relevant that you’re the one who posted the blind originally, since if you folded rather than shoved, you’d end up minus that bet.
|
|
|
7:39 pm November 18, 2007
| Sinclair
Guest
| | | |
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for replying Ed.
So you’re risking 1BB less by shoving from the BB right?
|
|
|
7:41 pm November 18, 2007
| Ed Miller
Admin
| | | |
|
| posts 162 |
|
|
Well, sort of, but only because you’ve already risked the first 1BB by posting the blind.
|
|
|
9:13 pm November 18, 2007
| rasta
New Member
| | | |
|
| posts 1 |
|
|
How much value can we assign to the fact that from the BB we are also removing the positional disadvantage by shoving?
|
|
|
10:11 pm November 18, 2007
| Todd
Member
| | | |
|
| posts 421 |
|
|
rasta said:
How much value can we assign to the fact that from the BB we are also removing the positional disadvantage by shoving?
Fold equity dominates this sort of end game situation. The hands you are going to call with at 14BB facing a raise should be almost zero unless your oponent is going to check any flop he misses. You have a little latitude in the blinds because you can choose to delay your shove and run a stop and go. With stacks that short, you are better off being in the BB. You get first action. That’s why the stop and go is so effective.
|
|
|
10:20 pm November 18, 2007
| Todd
Member
| | | |
|
| posts 421 |
|
|
Sinclair said:
Hey everyone! I thought I would throw this question out there since I’m a little confused over the idea of "sunk cost."
A hand came up where I spewed off my chips from the button by jamming over the CO with A8s and ~ 14BBs. He had been raising very aggressively and he had folded to raises in previous hands so I’m still undecided about that play (although in the long run it probably isn’t very good).
However, afterwards I had a discussion with a friend of mine about the play. I said I should be more inclined to shove if I was in the BB rather than the button facing a CO open.
He said he would rather shove from the button b/c he wins more due to the blinds in the pot.
I said yeah, but there are also two more players behind you when you shove from the button and it costs less to shove from the BB.
Then we became confused in discussing this last point and the term “sunk cost” was brought up or whatever.
So here is my question:
All else equal, does it cost less to shove from the BB as opposed to the Button over a CO raise
You didn’t spew. You raised and lost. There was a very good chance you had the best hand. When you’re that short, just stick it in.
One thing to note. When you are going for the resteal, prefer a hand like QJ over A2 or K6. It performs a lot better when called (less likely to be dominated and more likely to give you 2 overs vs pairs). Your hand A8s is really pretty good. It’s better than 1/2 the As and it’s suited, which has a small amount of benefit. Don’t let your friend convince you that you should have laid that down at that point in the tournament with that much dead money in the pot. Tournament endgame is super volatile (I just lost a huge hand 20 minutes ago with A9 vs A5 and a second with AK vs TT that probably cost me 3 finish sports and a couple of K at a final table of 30K guaranteed tourney. These things just happen), sometimes you just get you money in good against his range and bad against his hand. Sad but true.
|
|