Message Board : Problems arising in loose NL-like games.

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering

Search 
Search Forums:


 




Problems arising in loose NL-like games.

Add a New Topic Reply to Post
UserPost

5:27 am
April 22, 2007


cpk

Member

posts 18

So I'm playing 5-10 at Tulalip, which as some of you know doesn't have real no limit, but rather spread limit with a $500 max bet. But it's the best we can do in Washington State. Anyway, I have about $1800 and most of the people at the table have more. I have the button and AQo. UTG, MP1, and MP2 limp. I jack it up to $70. The BB, UTG, and MP2 call. All 3 players are slightly tricky but really bad overall–they're the sorts who will blow off several hundred with bottom pair. Even though they're bad, they're NOT morons and will try to put you on a hand. The flop is 872 rainbow. They all check to me.

Here's the thing. I am playing in this crazy 5-10, this situation happens frequently, and I actually have no clue what to do about it. I would ask about it on 2+2, but nobody on 2+2 plays in games like this.

Idea #1. C-Bet. Here's the problem I have. A decent c-bet here would be about $200. But what happens if someone calls? This is likely if these guys have any part of the board. Now the pot is $680 and all I have is Ace high. To fire a second barrel means I have to bet about $450. Here I am thinking about investing $650 into a pot (more than a third of my stack) when I have Ace high. Pretty crazy.

Idea #2. Mini c-bet. Ed wrote an article about this sort of thing a few months ago. When you have a lot of loose opponents, maybe c-bet a little bit. Sometimes most of them will fold. If not, you haven't given up much. So, a bet of $60 might do the trick here. But say I get one caller–the pot is still $400, and a second barrel would be about $270. Blah–$330 on Ace high is still too darn much. Of course, I don't have to fire the second barrel….

Idea #3. Check. Well, that's the safe route. But I got to thinking about what I would do if I hit one of my cards on the turn. I have NO IDEA what I would do. Probably call strong bets and blast weak bets? I guess I had some idea, then. But mostly not.

As it is, I checked. The turn brought another 2. BB led out $150 and everyone else, including me, folded.

Then I got to thinking–maybe my preflop raise screwed me up? I mean, 4xBB+1 per limper is just a guideline, and I use it because I don't know any better. Maybe I should have raised more? Here's the tradeoff. With AQ, I'm interested in getting it 3-handed or heads-up so I can easily control the betting. [I've also got to be mindful of getting smooth-called by AK in the BB.] Perhaps I should be sizing my raises to accomplish this more effectively. If I'm getting too many callers for my hand, shouldn't I just raise more than normal? But the tension I see is that you don't ever want to raise so much that you'll only get better hands calling. So maybe a raise to $100 would work better? But then the problem is that if I somehow get 3 callers, I am not so sure I enjoy playing my hand even if an Ace flops!

Another idea would be to just limp, because there's no point in raising a mediocre hand like AQo if it's just going to cause you to lose control of the pot. Limping keeps the pot small and I can "c-bet" with impunity, float a flop bet with the intention of taking it away on the turn if they show weakness, and so forth.

Am I even thinking about the right things here, or am I just goofy?

 EDIT, ADDING:  By the way, I realize that it's not standard to c-bet into 3 people in the first place.  But it seems SOOOOO LAME to just give up on the pot.

2:00 pm
April 22, 2007


BTR

Member

posts 180

Where did you get that a decent cont. bet would be $200?  There's $280 in the pot, but it's a rainbow flop and only moderately coordinated.  Is a $70-$100 bet here really that bad?  If your cont. bet is called on the flop, you could check behind on the turn to control the size of the pot and get a free card.  You probably would do this sometimes with a big pocket pair anyway to avoid the pot getting out of control.

I don't play a lot of NL or spread limit so my post is more questions than answers.

4:48 pm
April 22, 2007


cpk

Member

posts 18

Hm.  I guess I'm thinking right about keeping the pot under control, but I didn't come to the obvious conclusion.  I just don't have a feel for the game, yet.  

 I still think it may be a bad idea to c-bet into 3 loose, tricky players.  But if I were going to, now I see that a $100 bet might do the trick.  I don't know–these players are unpredictable, which makes them dangerous, despite being huge net donators to the game.

5:24 pm
April 22, 2007


Durun

Guest

I haven't read much on spread limit games but it seems as though there is an interesting element to this game, not only can you control the size of the pot but you can also control in some instances the sort of bet's that can be made on future streets. By that i mean in the example you gave a ~200 c-bet if called would allow for a ~pot sized bet on the turn. However if you over bet the bet ~300 then the turn can only be a half pot sized bet.

would it be better in your situation to over-bet the pot say a raise of 300?

What i like about that size raise is if it doesn't win the hand on the flop, you can check behind on the turn regardless if you hit and set up the river for an easy call down if you improve. Your ideal situation W a top pair top kicker hand is to face nothing more than half pot sized bets on the later streets. If you were to only bet 200 and get called if it goes check check on the turn he may pot it on the river leaving you with a much tougher decision should you improve. Just my thoughts…..

5:40 pm
April 22, 2007


Todd

Member

posts 427

I don't really like the raise to 70.  You're building a big pot with a small pot hand.  You already have 3 limpers.  At most I'd throw in a little raise to 30 or 40 to discourage the blinds.   You have the button and position.  I'd seriously consider limping.  AQo is not the nuts.

Now that you have rasied and gotten 3 calls.  You really want to stay out of trouble.  Bluffing, which is what your c-bet is at this point, is not staying out of trouble.  When it checks to you, check behind.  If it is bet to you, seriously consider folding.  If you check behind and hit one of your cards.  Either call a medium sized or bet for value if it checks to you.  Your goal here is to make it to showdown without stacking off.  

…snip…

Then I got to thinking–maybe my preflop raise screwed me up? I mean, 4xBB+1 per limper is just a guideline, and I use it because I don't know any better. Maybe I should have raised more?

…snip…

For the love of Pete, please don't raise more.  That just builds an enormous pot with a hand that doesn't play well in an enormous multiway pot.  

I think limping is far and away your best option.  If you happen to catch aces up or some such thing, there will be plenty of time to build a pot.  If you catch anA or Q, you can use your position to control the pot and avoid going broke if you see some reall action in front of you.

If you think about the sorts of hands that limp call, small pairs, middle suited connectors, etc, this flop is likely to have connected with one of the players out there.  As played, you were right to check and fold to a bet.

Add a New Topic Reply to Post


Reply to Topic: Problems arising in loose NL-like games.

Guest Name (Required):

Guest EMail (Required):

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of: 11 + 12        (Required)

Topic Reply:


 

About the Noted Poker Authority forum

Currently Online:

5 Guests

Maximum Online: 38

Forums:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 555

Posts: 3234

Members:

There are 3059 members

There are 119 guests


Ed Miller has made 162 posts

Top Posters:

Todd - 427

threads13 - 349

karbyn - 184

BTR - 180

Pawel - 116

Administrator: Ed Miller | Moderators: Ed Miller


© Simple:Press Forum - Version 3.1.4 (Build 357)