Message Board : Deep stacked monter - did I lose value on the river?

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering

Search 
Search Forums:


 




Deep stacked monter - did I lose value on the river?

Add a New Topic Reply to Post
UserPost

8:21 am
November 2, 2007


Todd

Member

posts 424

The nature of the villain is important for this hand.  He’s hit some big hands and has a monster stack.  He’s been willing to call off a lot of chips on draws, but he won’t call with nothing and steal.  If you check he will make small stabs at the pot.  I haven’t seen him make any big stabs.  He’s been limping with any 2 since he tripled up.  As I said, he’ll stab at weakness, but when a lot of money has gone into the pot, he’s shown up with 2 pair or better, except for one time when he showed up with a Q-high FD on the turn that outran trips A’s on the river. 

Here’s the hand:

1-2NL

Hero (stack ~450) in the BB with 77

Villain (stack ~ 1K) raises to 6, btn calls, Hero calls

Villain hardly ever raises.  Likely has big cards or a high pair. 

Flop 678 rainbow.

Hero checks, villain bets 15, btn calls, hero raises to 45, villain calls, button folds

Pot ~140 

Turn is a 4 for a board of 6784 with 2 clubs

My turn bet may seem dicey, but I don’t think the 4 helped him since he raised pre-flop.  He’s been limping a wide range and I think that 55 or A5 is unlikely as I’ve seen him limp with a number of low Axs.  I feel it’s pretty safe to bet and I want to be able to get the whole stack in on the river.  Ifhe would have shoved, I have no idea what I would have done, but it surely would have involved vomit.

Hero bets $130, Villain calls $130

I’m almost sure he has 99 or TT, though he may have something like ATs.  He calls reall, really loosely with weak draws.

Pot ~$400 

River is a 4, filling me up.

I knew the 4 didn’t help the villain.  But, I had less than a PSB behind so I stuck it in.

Hero bets $260, villain thinks for quite some time and folds.

Anyone think a check would have been better?  The villain was pretty loose, but not for that sort of bet.  When the money didn’t go in on the turn, I was sure I had the best hand.  The 4 didn’t change that.  I hated the thought of him checking behind and not giving him the chance to call.  But, in retrospect, a check feels more right.  He’s just not going to show up with TT for another $260.  I’m not sure he’d bet it either, though.  Any thoughts?  It’s altogether possible that I got all I was going to get out of him no matter what river line I took.  These hands come up so rarely that I hand’t given a lot of thought as to how to get value here.   

 

 

12:31 pm
November 2, 2007


karbyn

Member

posts 184

I don’t think you could squeeze any more value out of him.  If he would call $100-130, he should call your all-in. In this particular hand, yes, you could have bet $100 and he probably would have called.  However, who bets that little when they only have 1/2 the pot left in their stack?

I think a check would result in him checking too … the board is too dangerous to risk a c/r with just an overpair.  A bet is the best, even against a loose opponent.  He’ll call if he has anything worthwhile. 

One option … a larger turn bet … pot size bet makes the pot $420 with $250 left.  You knew he had something when he called your flop raise.  Try $175?  Pot is then $470 with $235 left.  You might have lost him on the turn though.

The alternative is a little smaller.  $100 on the turn means a $360 pot, with $290 left.  You can then realistically bet $100, maybe he raises, but likely calls … pot = $560 then 

I am not sure quite how to get it all in in this circumstance.  I think you probably did it best, he just didn’t play along.

The best part of the whole hand, other than winning a big pot, is that he still has no idea what you had.  Probably figured you for a straight.

11:05 am
November 3, 2007


DonkStar

Member

posts 50

I tend to agree with karbyn.  I think I check was likely to get checked behind, although I may be projected my own reaction there.  You may have been able to put a tiny amount in and gotten a crying call (something like $75 or less). 

 If the villian had a TT like hand, he did have 2 pair.  You said he usually shows up at showdown with that as a minimum holding.  If that was your read, (overpair), I think your bet on the river does end up having the best value long term though, as the times it gets called give enough equity to make it the preferred move.

2:29 pm
November 5, 2007


HungryJ0e

Member

posts 72

Agree with all… you best equity play here is to just shove it in and see what happens… He’s likely to call either a sizable bet or (more likely) check/fold.  Knowing what you knew on the river, I’m not sure even a small bet would get called… and his hesitation before folding could be an act or an attempt to get a read on you with a weak holding like 8 9 (depending on how this guy plays).

Two points though:

1. Did you consider a squeeze play preflop?  I’d probably be doing it in this situation about 50/50… villain is loose preflop, to adequately compensate out of position you need to be thinking about widening your re-raising range.  Making it about $20 total pre-flop brings the SPR to about where I want it as well.

2. Not sure your $30 check-raise on the flop was sound.  You’re defining your hand fairly well, but not laying enough odds to keep players around with a very coordinated board.  If the villain stays, the button is seeing very attractive odds in position… wondering if you would have made the turn bet if the button had called as well?  Against two players out of position with this board/stack sizes I feel the flop check-raise needs to larger.  Pot sized or a little more feels right.

Also think you need to add 8-9 suited in his range as a likely holding, and perhaps 8-9 offsuit… even tight players might raise with 8-9 suited in early position to throw off thinking opponents as a sort of semi-bluff… 7-8 suited less likely of course as it is weaker, uses the case seven, and would be more inclined to play back at you at some point during the hand.

- HJ

3:56 pm
November 5, 2007


Todd

Member

posts 424

Thanks for the notes, Joe.  I hadn’t really considered a squeeze.  I probably don’t squeeze enough in general, but I was specifically set mining against this guy.  He wouldn’t fold anything preflop.  He was 90 VPIP preflop.  No Joke.  That he raised definied his hand pretty well.  He almost never raised.  So, I don’t think 89 was likely to be in his range.  Against a tough player, I think you’re absolutely right that it is a hand I need to put in his range.

The way I played my hand was based on some pretty specific reads.  I was very sure the check/raise was going to be called unless he had total air (maybe even with just overs) and I wouldn’t have bet the 130 on the turn had I not ruled out a 5 in his hand.  Had he had 9T, much of the money would have been on the flop.  So, I thought the 130 was both safe and likely to be called.  He called big turn bets incredibly lightly if he had any sort of draw.  I had been chipping away at him all night , checking and calling with bigger hands when he was likely to bluff, putting in value bets on the end when he wasn’t likely too.  I had a pretty good idea how he was playing and how he put money into the pot.  He was still drawing on the turn and he would pay almost any price on a draw.  When I finally got the whale on the hook with the monster, it broke my heart to see him fold even though I took 200 off him.

11:41 am
November 6, 2007


HungryJ0e

Member

posts 72

Todd -

I think this would actually be a good hand to analyze the appropriateness of a squeeze… hitting your set on the flop is somewhere around 7-1 (know I should have this memorized, but I’ve been away from the tables for a while due to work), and of course you’ve got to get paid off…

Balance that against a squeeze, which of course may get called… but if that’s the case against a weak opponent you may be able to outplay him later in the hand (although he’s got position in his favor)…

I dunno… on the whole I think you’ve most likely got the best hand preflop, but it is unlikely to improve and you’ll be out of position for the rest of the hand which would argue for the re-raise.  You say he’s rarely raising; surely if he’s limping nearly every pot, he’s also got to be looser on his raising range…  I can also see your points on why you didn’t re-raise (and again it’s an automatic play in this spot for me, but more like 50-50).  There are certainly arguments for and against squeezing here preflop and indeed your hand is almost *too good* for a squeeze, with a trashier hand I’d be more inclined.

Anyone else have opinions on the squeeze preflop here?  Ed, can you weigh in an help us out?

- HJ

Add a New Topic Reply to Post


Reply to Topic: Deep stacked monter - did I lose value on the river?

Guest Name (Required):

Guest EMail (Required):

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of: 5 + 9        (Required)

Topic Reply:


 

About the Noted Poker Authority forum

Currently Online:

9 Guests

Maximum Online: 38

Forums:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 555

Posts: 3231

Members:

There are 3056 members

There are 119 guests


Ed Miller has made 162 posts

Top Posters:

Todd - 424

threads13 - 349

karbyn - 184

BTR - 180

Pawel - 116

Administrator: Ed Miller | Moderators: Ed Miller


© Simple:Press Forum - Version 3.1.4 (Build 357)