Message Board : Calling pre-flop with less than stellar hands

Current User: Guest Login Register
Please consider registering

Search 
Search Forums:


 




Calling pre-flop with less than stellar hands

Add a New Topic Reply to Post
UserPost

2:42 pm
April 28, 2007


thatjimguy

Member

posts 80

Every so often, I hear of being able to play total trash hands. Dig this excerpt from Byron Jacobs "How good is your limit hold em"

This example talks about your starting hand being 7h 4c in the small blind and in a loose, passive 15/30 game. An early and middle player limp and it's $5 to you.

    "Assuming that the big blind does not raise, - and the characteristic of the game makes this likely - you are getting 11-1 odds for your $5."

 1st Q: You get 11-1 odds for your $5 with 7h 4c. How do you figure that out?

    "However, your hand is so awful that this only represents good value. Change it to 7h 6c and you call call with enthusiasm."

 2nd Q: This is what throws me. Isn't 76o a terrible hand in a loose game? Maybe it's because he usually talking about middle limits and the games are different? But he described the game as loose and passive and a loose and passive game is a loose and passive game no matter the limit right?

It's not that I need to play trash hands. I am doing just fine staying away from the. But I wouldn't mind uderstanding the concept of what he is talking about.

Thanks

thatjimguy 

3:14 pm
April 28, 2007


BTR

Member

posts 180

1st Q:  15*3 (2 Limpers + big blind) = $45 = $10 you already have in the pot so pot = $55.  It's $5 back to you so you are getting 55 to 5 for a call or 11:1

2nd Q:  The main concept at play here is the small blind is 2/3's the big blind so it's VERY cheap to enter the pot.  If you don't get slapped upside the head with the deck you can drop it and only be out $5.  You're not looking to flop a 4 or a 7.  You're looking for 2 pair or better.

3:32 pm
April 28, 2007


BTR

Member

posts 180

I ran some numbers on this.  Against a random hand (Big Blind) and two loose limpers (50%).  You have about ~16.75% equity.  You're contributing 9% of the pot so you have an immediate equity edge of 7.75% + implied odds.

Playing this hand on the button instead of the small blind changes this a lot.  Now you're getting 55 : 15 or 3.6:1 on a call.  Your call represents ~21% of the pot but your equity is still only ~16.75% so you have and equity deficit and the small blind will likely call getting > 11:1 odds making your equity deficit even worse.

3:16 am
April 29, 2007


thatjimguy

Member

posts 80

Ah, I should have been more specific on q#1…I probaly sounded like a dunce there. I didn't mean to make it sound like I didnt understand pot odds. Tongue out

I probally should have left q1 out and just asked q2. That's really what I wanted to get at.

So, if this were true, then wouldn't it be right to call more hands from the blinds then overall if enough players are in? As long as…

…I understand that I am looking to drop hands real quick if they arent gangbusters on the flop? Kinda like small pocket pairs?

…I play better post flop than most of my opponents?

thanks

 thatjimguy


4:29 am
April 29, 2007


Tiago

Member

posts 3

I think in the blind structure you described almost any two cards are worth playing regardless the number of opponents. Right?

11:03 am
April 29, 2007


BTR

Member

posts 180

So, if this were true, then wouldn't it be right to call more hands from the blinds then overall if enough players are in? As long as…

…I understand that I am looking to drop hands real quick if they arent gangbusters on the flop? Kinda like small pocket pairs?

…I play better post flop than most of my opponents?


Yes, in fact that's why the preflop charts are much looser for the small blind in SSHE.  It has you playing any two suited cards.  Two random suited cards aren't profitable from anywhere else on the table but they are from the small blind for 1 bet.  They do gain value the more people enter the pot, just not enough to make them profitable.

With the worst hand possible in the small blind vs. any random holding (big blind) is 32o and has 32.1% equity preflop.  On a typical table your completion will be 25% of the pot for a 7% equity edge.  However that assumes that your big blind foe will never raise so playing every hand in this spot isn't optimal.

It's a little different out of the big blind facing a raise because even the loosest of villians don't raise every hand so the range is considerably tighter decreasing your equity.  Even if you knew your opponent would only raise with AA you could still make the call with a few hands.  JTs has about 21% equity vs AA.  You would be taking slightly the worst of it with a call but should make that up easily with implied odds.

Blind defense is tricky but the discount you get from already being invested makes a lot of hands that wouldn't be playable playable.

Hope I didn't go to mathy on you, I tend to do that.

Add a New Topic Reply to Post


Reply to Topic: Calling pre-flop with less than stellar hands

Guest Name (Required):

Guest EMail (Required):

Guest URL (required)

Math Required!
What is the sum of: 12 + 8        (Required)

Topic Reply:


 

About the Noted Poker Authority forum

Currently Online:

Todd

12 Guests

Maximum Online: 38

Forums:

Groups: 1

Forums: 1

Topics: 549

Posts: 3173

Members:

There are 2905 members

There are 118 guests


Ed Miller has made 162 posts

Top Posters:

Todd - 421

threads13 - 348

BTR - 180

karbyn - 168

Pawel - 116

Administrator: Ed Miller | Moderators: Ed Miller


© Simple:Press Forum - Version 3.1.4 (Build 357)