<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playing Deceptively &#8211; Part 1: Defining Deception</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MisstressElka</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/comment-page-1#comment-14935</link>
		<dc:creator>MisstressElka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=680#comment-14935</guid>
		<description>Nice articles about deception, Ed. Thank you very very much!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice articles about deception, Ed. Thank you very very much!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/comment-page-1#comment-14591</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=680#comment-14591</guid>
		<description>To me, being deceptive means one of two things:

1. Playing my hand different then what my opponents would expect me to if they put me on a range of hands.

2. Playing my hand like my opponents would expect me to play a given range of hands, but I actually don&#039;t have that range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, being deceptive means one of two things:</p>
<p>1. Playing my hand different then what my opponents would expect me to if they put me on a range of hands.</p>
<p>2. Playing my hand like my opponents would expect me to play a given range of hands, but I actually don&#8217;t have that range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threads13</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/comment-page-1#comment-14590</link>
		<dc:creator>threads13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=680#comment-14590</guid>
		<description>Excellent.  This is something that I think about a lot in poker.  You really have a lot of ammunition if you can keep your ranges somewhat balanced.  I think that even the decent players in the online small stakes games struggle with this concept as they will often take lines that leave their hand range unbalanced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent.  This is something that I think about a lot in poker.  You really have a lot of ammunition if you can keep your ranges somewhat balanced.  I think that even the decent players in the online small stakes games struggle with this concept as they will often take lines that leave their hand range unbalanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScienceMan</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/comment-page-1#comment-14588</link>
		<dc:creator>ScienceMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 12:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=680#comment-14588</guid>
		<description>Good day Ed and all ppl out there.

A very informative post, as always.

But theres one moment i would like to clear up for myself.

In your example, imagine you flop a set also, holding 77. All the remaining action is the same as described in the original example. 

So after the villain shoves, you are pretty sure he flopped a set. But which one, exactly? Well, according to preflop action,u might suppose he holds 66. But if he opens up and shows QQ, could you then call his play &quot;deceptive&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day Ed and all ppl out there.</p>
<p>A very informative post, as always.</p>
<p>But theres one moment i would like to clear up for myself.</p>
<p>In your example, imagine you flop a set also, holding 77. All the remaining action is the same as described in the original example. </p>
<p>So after the villain shoves, you are pretty sure he flopped a set. But which one, exactly? Well, according to preflop action,u might suppose he holds 66. But if he opens up and shows QQ, could you then call his play &#8220;deceptive&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/comment-page-1#comment-14585</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=680#comment-14585</guid>
		<description>BilboSan,
Thanks. :)

SelfMade,
Should be working again now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BilboSan,<br />
Thanks. <img src='http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>SelfMade,<br />
Should be working again now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SelfMade</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/comment-page-1#comment-14584</link>
		<dc:creator>SelfMade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=680#comment-14584</guid>
		<description>Print button seems to have stopped working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Print button seems to have stopped working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BilboSan</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/understanding-deception-part-1-defining-deception.html/comment-page-1#comment-14580</link>
		<dc:creator>BilboSan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=680#comment-14580</guid>
		<description>Good post, especially the first part.

My name for what most people think is deceptive is &quot;Transparent Trickiness&quot;.

For example, any time you raise preflop with AA and then check/raise an Axx board, you are being transparently tricky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, especially the first part.</p>
<p>My name for what most people think is deceptive is &#8220;Transparent Trickiness&#8221;.</p>
<p>For example, any time you raise preflop with AA and then check/raise an Axx board, you are being transparently tricky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

