<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Simple Things An Average Small Stakes Live Game Regular Can Try To Make More Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-simple-things-an-average-small-stakes-live-game-regular-can-try-to-make-more-money.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-simple-things-an-average-small-stakes-live-game-regular-can-try-to-make-more-money.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKQJ10</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-simple-things-an-average-small-stakes-live-game-regular-can-try-to-make-more-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-14481</link>
		<dc:creator>AKQJ10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=607#comment-14481</guid>
		<description>Great post, but I have some questions about when &quot;taking control of the game&quot; is appropriate versus when it isn&#039;t.

I&#039;ll try to formulate those thoughts into a forum post because I don&#039;t think many people will see comments on an old thread here.

==
Summarizing my questions about this (from an email to a friend):

 To me a lot of semibluff PFR is just going to lead to more donkey calling, big pots on the flop that no one can get away from so you can&#039;t bluff with your CBets, etc.   I could be looking at this all wrong.  
==
But I&#039;ll elaborate in the next day or two when I find time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, but I have some questions about when &#8220;taking control of the game&#8221; is appropriate versus when it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to formulate those thoughts into a forum post because I don&#8217;t think many people will see comments on an old thread here.</p>
<p>==<br />
Summarizing my questions about this (from an email to a friend):</p>
<p> To me a lot of semibluff PFR is just going to lead to more donkey calling, big pots on the flop that no one can get away from so you can&#8217;t bluff with your CBets, etc.   I could be looking at this all wrong.<br />
==<br />
But I&#8217;ll elaborate in the next day or two when I find time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karbyn</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-simple-things-an-average-small-stakes-live-game-regular-can-try-to-make-more-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-14462</link>
		<dc:creator>karbyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=607#comment-14462</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s say the game is just like you describe.  &quot;Runover-able&quot;.  Full ring 1/2.  2 are short stacked, 5 have $100-$200, and you have around $200, and 2 have $250+.

When you leave, but only because the games isn&#039;t juicy anymore, how do you gauge success?  What kind of stack would you end up with after say 4 hours?  I know, I know, variance.  But you repeat this 100 times ... obviously leaving with $300 isn&#039;t a good night.  It&#039;s OK.  Is it enough to have stacked another good player one time?  Or are we thinking upwards of $1,000?

These are ideas outside of the game itself, but still a big part or if overall, that I am trying to get a handle on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s say the game is just like you describe.  &#8220;Runover-able&#8221;.  Full ring 1/2.  2 are short stacked, 5 have $100-$200, and you have around $200, and 2 have $250+.</p>
<p>When you leave, but only because the games isn&#8217;t juicy anymore, how do you gauge success?  What kind of stack would you end up with after say 4 hours?  I know, I know, variance.  But you repeat this 100 times &#8230; obviously leaving with $300 isn&#8217;t a good night.  It&#8217;s OK.  Is it enough to have stacked another good player one time?  Or are we thinking upwards of $1,000?</p>
<p>These are ideas outside of the game itself, but still a big part or if overall, that I am trying to get a handle on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karbyn</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-simple-things-an-average-small-stakes-live-game-regular-can-try-to-make-more-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-14400</link>
		<dc:creator>karbyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=607#comment-14400</guid>
		<description>My thoughts:

Taking Control Of The Game - the players at my local casino will play with you quite quickly.  I say &quot;with you&quot; but not &quot;back at you&quot;.  For every 100 times there is a bet, 1there will be 10 reraises, and 1 re-reraise that isn&#039;t all-in.  Usually it turns into a call or a fold.  So, yes, I would agree that is the case around my game.  Aggression gets you a fair bit or respect.  
2 recent hands come to mind:
  1 raise, 1 caller before me, I reraise from MP with 87s. 1 caller after, and other 2 also call.  Flop comes KT4r.  Initial raiser bets half the pot, 1 fold, and I raise the full pot.  All fold.
  1 limper, I raise with 65s in LP.  Button call, both blinds call.  Flop comes KQJ.  1 check, I bet 2/3 pot, all fold.  
Those 2 hands both made me smile.

Value Betting On The River - I definitely don&#039;t do this enough.  Check this hand for some discussion on this: http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/board/all-poker/small-ace-in-lp/page-1/post-3044/#p3044

Varying Bet Sizes - That is the one thing I have noticed at my casino.  If someone is going to play their hand, they generally call for 3x BB or 8x BB.  Doesn&#039;t seem to matter.  They et the money in the pot, and fold too often on the flop.  Just like the 2 hands above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts:</p>
<p>Taking Control Of The Game &#8211; the players at my local casino will play with you quite quickly.  I say &#8220;with you&#8221; but not &#8220;back at you&#8221;.  For every 100 times there is a bet, 1there will be 10 reraises, and 1 re-reraise that isn&#8217;t all-in.  Usually it turns into a call or a fold.  So, yes, I would agree that is the case around my game.  Aggression gets you a fair bit or respect.<br />
2 recent hands come to mind:<br />
  1 raise, 1 caller before me, I reraise from MP with 87s. 1 caller after, and other 2 also call.  Flop comes KT4r.  Initial raiser bets half the pot, 1 fold, and I raise the full pot.  All fold.<br />
  1 limper, I raise with 65s in LP.  Button call, both blinds call.  Flop comes KQJ.  1 check, I bet 2/3 pot, all fold.<br />
Those 2 hands both made me smile.</p>
<p>Value Betting On The River &#8211; I definitely don&#8217;t do this enough.  Check this hand for some discussion on this: <a href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/board/all-poker/small-ace-in-lp/page-1/post-3044/#p3044" rel="nofollow">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/board/all-poker/small-ace-in-lp/page-1/post-3044/#p3044</a></p>
<p>Varying Bet Sizes &#8211; That is the one thing I have noticed at my casino.  If someone is going to play their hand, they generally call for 3x BB or 8x BB.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to matter.  They et the money in the pot, and fold too often on the flop.  Just like the 2 hands above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

