<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three No-Limit Realities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-no-limit-realities.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-no-limit-realities.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:36:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony7682</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-no-limit-realities.html/comment-page-1#comment-15917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony7682</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=872#comment-15917</guid>
		<description>Hello all,

I realize that this is an old post now, but hopefully not too old to discuss.

My question is on the second item: &quot;Most Pots Never Reach Showdown&quot;. Betting made hands, in position, on the turn and river generally makes sense... But how do you balance that against other axioms frequently out there in the poker literature: &quot;Big hand, big pot; small hand, small pot&quot;. Or &quot;check behind a medium hand like top pair for pot control&quot;. Yet another way: &quot;Don&#039;t get pot committed with a mediocre hand&quot;.

Are those considerations more important on the flop than turn or river?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all,</p>
<p>I realize that this is an old post now, but hopefully not too old to discuss.</p>
<p>My question is on the second item: &#8220;Most Pots Never Reach Showdown&#8221;. Betting made hands, in position, on the turn and river generally makes sense&#8230; But how do you balance that against other axioms frequently out there in the poker literature: &#8220;Big hand, big pot; small hand, small pot&#8221;. Or &#8220;check behind a medium hand like top pair for pot control&#8221;. Yet another way: &#8220;Don&#8217;t get pot committed with a mediocre hand&#8221;.</p>
<p>Are those considerations more important on the flop than turn or river?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-no-limit-realities.html/comment-page-1#comment-15639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=872#comment-15639</guid>
		<description>Hi Eli,

It&#039;s my brand new e-book, &lt;a href=&quot;http://smallstakesnolimitholdem.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Small Stakes No-Limit Hold&#039;em&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eli,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s my brand new e-book, <a href="http://smallstakesnolimitholdem.com/" rel="nofollow">Small Stakes No-Limit Hold&#8217;em</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eli</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-no-limit-realities.html/comment-page-1#comment-15638</link>
		<dc:creator>eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=872#comment-15638</guid>
		<description>HI, Jay G,

Which book you talking abut? what is THE name? and can u tell me more about this book?

Sincerely

ELI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI, Jay G,</p>
<p>Which book you talking abut? what is THE name? and can u tell me more about this book?</p>
<p>Sincerely</p>
<p>ELI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay G</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/three-no-limit-realities.html/comment-page-1#comment-15624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=872#comment-15624</guid>
		<description>Ed,
I&#039;m only up to page 77 of SSNLH but I have already gotten back 10 times what I paid for this book. The section,&quot;Aces On The Turn&quot; alone is worth what I paid. 

I have now stopped playing and will not resume until I finish reading the rest of this masterpiece.

Thank you for all the money I&#039;m going to make.

Sincerely
Jay G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed,<br />
I&#8217;m only up to page 77 of SSNLH but I have already gotten back 10 times what I paid for this book. The section,&#8221;Aces On The Turn&#8221; alone is worth what I paid. </p>
<p>I have now stopped playing and will not resume until I finish reading the rest of this masterpiece.</p>
<p>Thank you for all the money I&#8217;m going to make.</p>
<p>Sincerely<br />
Jay G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

