Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

The River Min-Raise

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

The river value min-raise is a play I use with some frequency. I most typically try it when I’m heads-up with position on the river, and I have a hand I was planning to bet for value if checked to. But instead of checking, my opponent bets. And, given the way the hand has played, I think my opponent’s range consists of a number of relatively weak made hands that he could be betting for value or making a blocking bet with. Here’s an example from a hand I played a few months back:

It’s a 5-handed online $0.50-$1 game. I have a $100 stack, and everyone has me covered. I’m first to act and raise to $3.50 with K :heart: Q :spade: . Only the small blind calls, making a pot of $8.

The flop is Q :club: 5 :diamond: 3 :spade: . The small blind checks, and I bet $8. The small blind calls.

The turn is the 8 :heart: . The small blind checks, and I check.

The river is the 4 :spade: . The small blind bets $10, into the $24 pot, and I min-raise to $20.

The small blind calls and shows J :spade: J :heart: . My queens are good.

My opponent is a regular in the game and a tight, aggressive player. After cold-calling preflop in the small blind and check-calling this ragged flop, I thought unimproved pocket pairs would represent a large portion of my opponent’s range on the turn. Since he’s a tight player, I wouldn’t expect him to call with many hands containing a five or a trey. I also wouldn’t expect him to call preflop with hands containing a queen weaker than about Q-J suited. And no flush draws or high straight draws are possible on this flop. Thus, after calling preflop and on the flop, I expect him frequently to hold a pocket pair.

I didn’t think I could get him to pay off three streets with a pocket pair smaller than queens (or with most of the rest of his range that I’m ahead of), so I figured I’d check it back on the turn and represent missed big cards like A-J. Then I could go for some value on the river.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “The River Min-Raise”

garcia1000
@ Wed Jan 14, 2009 08:43:20 PM
1

If your opponent has polarized range on river why not call instead of bluff-raise?

tunit
@ Thu Jan 15, 2009 07:09:54 AM
2

in the example hand what are you doing if your opponent shoves over the top… with a “thinking opponent” couldn’t he sometimes turn up with a set here? i agree a set likely bets more than 10 on the river but what are we doing when opponent shoves all in- we aren’t beating anything except a bluff……

Roman
@ Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:20:26 AM
3

Buddy I play my aces like he did, many make the player bet his top pair with out scaring him off the half pot size bet which will make him fold on a relatively big pot by river, but not as big as it will be once you call that dumb ass minraise

Roman
@ Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:21:21 AM
4

Horrible

Pim
@ Mon Jan 19, 2009 02:09:45 AM
5

You mention that the SB is a tight aggressive player but only calls the USD 3.50 raise preflop. I would not say that is typical aggressive play. I would say that is weak stupid play. Moreover, the SB plays his jacks very weak throughout the hand.

Ed Miller
@ Mon Jan 19, 2009 07:33:02 AM
6

garcia,

You bluff-raise rather than call when you don’t have a hand to call with. If you have a bluff-catcher yourself then calling is typically better.

tunit,

I would probably have folded to a big river reraise in this hand because the flop was so dry and my opponent called a bet. It’s hard to believe that he would have called the flop bet with nothing out of position with the intention of checking the turn and then bluff 3-betting the river. If he min 3-bet me I’d probably pay off grudgingly… but really I make this play with some frequency and only rarely get 3-bet at all.

If there had been more draws on the flop I would be more inclined to call the 3-bet because he would have more busted draws in his range and therefore more hands to run a bluff with. But if there had been more draws on the flop I likely wouldn’t have checked the turn.

Roman,

I’m sorry, but I don’t understand what you’re saying.

Pim,

Well, I don’t know what you call this guy then, but the regulars at $0.50-$1 play hands like this all the time. I don’t remember what his preflop stats were, but I’d guess they were quite tight (nitty even) like 17/14. As for not being aggressive… well he did find a river value bet with a hand weaker than top pair. I know a ton of (weak/bad) players who would never value bet a hand less than top pair, so this guy is at least more aggressive than them.

Again, I don’t remember who my opponent was in this hand, but I’m pretty sure if I said he was a regular that I also thought he was probably a winner at these stakes. It’s all relative of course, but overall I’d say anyone who can win at any kind of rate in the $0.50-$1 6-max game on Full Tilt is a decent poker player.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>