<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The No-Limit Toolbox &#8212; The Re-Squeeze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 29# - A Caixa de Ferramenta do No-Limit: O Re-Squeeze &#171; Teorias do Poker</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html/comment-page-1#comment-13476</link>
		<dc:creator>29# - A Caixa de Ferramenta do No-Limit: O Re-Squeeze &#171; Teorias do Poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 03:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html#comment-13476</guid>
		<description>[...] Junho 17, 2008   The No-Limit Toolbox - The Re-Squeeze [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Junho 17, 2008   The No-Limit Toolbox &#8211; The Re-Squeeze [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Zen</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html/comment-page-1#comment-9602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html#comment-9602</guid>
		<description>Do you resqueeze deeper-stacked than that, Ed, or are you going to be too concerned about the fourbet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you resqueeze deeper-stacked than that, Ed, or are you going to be too concerned about the fourbet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bsheck</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html/comment-page-1#comment-9564</link>
		<dc:creator>bsheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html#comment-9564</guid>
		<description>You could also flat-call a raise with a big hand too, especially if there&#039;s an aggressive reraiser behind you. Let&#039;s say you&#039;re playing $1/$2 with $200 stacks. Folds to the CO who raises to $8. You have QQ on the button. I like a call here if there are aggressive players in the blinds. Since they like to resteal so often (since they probably won&#039;t respect a cutoff raise), you can let them do so instead of blowing them out of the water with a reraise. In the event you do have to take a flop, you still have a strong (and disguised) hand, and will have position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could also flat-call a raise with a big hand too, especially if there&#8217;s an aggressive reraiser behind you. Let&#8217;s say you&#8217;re playing $1/$2 with $200 stacks. Folds to the CO who raises to $8. You have QQ on the button. I like a call here if there are aggressive players in the blinds. Since they like to resteal so often (since they probably won&#8217;t respect a cutoff raise), you can let them do so instead of blowing them out of the water with a reraise. In the event you do have to take a flop, you still have a strong (and disguised) hand, and will have position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html/comment-page-1#comment-9561</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html#comment-9561</guid>
		<description>...snip...
However, hand strength can give you a little extra value to cushion those times things go wrong, as they inevitably sometimes do.
...snip...

I believe Vanessa Selbst tried the resqueeze in the 2006 WSOP at a televised final table with a hand like 2-5.  She ran into AA (eventually quad A) and looked oh, so silly.  Remember kids, you want to have a good read if you&#039;re going to try this on TV.

To watch it really work, dig up the 2004 WSOP and watch Gavin Griffin pull it out of the bag with Gabe Thaler and another guy in one of the pot limit events.  

Matt Lessinger wrote about it in his &quot;Book of Bluffs&quot;.  After a little web searching, Ed also wrote about it here:

http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-27-the-squeeze-play.html

It was that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;snip&#8230;<br />
However, hand strength can give you a little extra value to cushion those times things go wrong, as they inevitably sometimes do.<br />
&#8230;snip&#8230;</p>
<p>I believe Vanessa Selbst tried the resqueeze in the 2006 WSOP at a televised final table with a hand like 2-5.  She ran into AA (eventually quad A) and looked oh, so silly.  Remember kids, you want to have a good read if you&#8217;re going to try this on TV.</p>
<p>To watch it really work, dig up the 2004 WSOP and watch Gavin Griffin pull it out of the bag with Gabe Thaler and another guy in one of the pot limit events.  </p>
<p>Matt Lessinger wrote about it in his &#8220;Book of Bluffs&#8221;.  After a little web searching, Ed also wrote about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-27-the-squeeze-play.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/qa/qa-27-the-squeeze-play.html</a></p>
<p>It was that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html/comment-page-1#comment-9560</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/the-no-limit-toolbox-the-re-squeeze.html#comment-9560</guid>
		<description>This is a tactic I have been using with players knowing to have a history of a squeeze play since I squeeze often with random hands and any time I have a cutoff or button playable hand but one has to be carefull it is not AA trying to provoke you to commit your stack preflop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tactic I have been using with players knowing to have a history of a squeeze play since I squeeze often with random hands and any time I have a cutoff or button playable hand but one has to be carefull it is not AA trying to provoke you to commit your stack preflop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

