The No-Limit Toolbox — The Light Preflop 3-Bet

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Simple Poker Tips from Noted Poker Authority The No-Limit Toolbox is a new series that showcases the array of tactics available to no-limit players.

The Play: The Light Preflop 3-Bet

How It Works: Someone raises, and you have position on them ...

Login/Register for more.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

If you find this article helpful please support the site to help keep the poker strategy tips coming.

6 Responses to “The No-Limit Toolbox — The Light Preflop 3-Bet”

threads13
@ Sat Jun 16, 2007 10:19:02 AM
1

This is a play I have been using more lately. However, I was under the impression that T9s isn’t the best hand to do this with since you can call a raise with it profitably. Specifically, I would be more apt to do with T7s since I don’t mind “wasting” T7s if I am to get 4-bet.

Sunshine
@ Sun Jun 17, 2007 03:29:20 AM
2

The above comment on the light PF 3 bet has got me thinking . t9s isnt the best hand to do this with since you can call a raise with it profitably….. Now to the big question where can you find the data to support this. I seem to be folding a lot of hands to raises in cash games. I would really like to know . I am talking about playing in B and M cash games not online.Hope youcan help me on this ED Thankyou

bsheck
@ Mon Jun 18, 2007 02:13:33 PM
3

I think you’re far better off flat-calling than 3-betting. You have position and a hand that can hit and win a big pot. Also, you’re going to find yourself in situations where you can steal on the turn and river if the board is scary enough and your opponent seems weak. This is better than reraising though because you’re investing less money preflop and saving it for after the flop when you’ll most use your positional advantage.

Philos
@ Mon Jun 18, 2007 02:22:24 PM
4

What’s the difference between The Light Preflop 3-Bet and The Preflop Squeeze?

Ed Miller
@ Tue Jun 19, 2007 01:30:15 AM
5

threads13 and bsheck,

While I agree that often calling with T9s would be as good or better, I disagree that it’s always or “by far” the better play. It really depends a lot on how your opponent plays. If they’re super loose and likely to go off for a big one if you hit a hand, then calling tends to be better.

But if they aren’t so willing to stack off, then your implied odds won’t be as good, and you may actually be better off playing a somewhat bigger pot (or just wining immediately) because you have to rely more heavily on stealing.

And, just so it’s clear, the light preflop 3-bet can be made “lighter” than T9s, and in those cases I suppose there would be less of an argument about whether calling or 3-betting would be better. (Perhaps I should have just used a weaker hand as the example to simplify things. After all, this is “Poker Made Simple”.)

Ed Miller
@ Tue Jun 19, 2007 01:32:40 AM
6

Philos,

Well, there’s no hard-and-fast difference between the plays. Except a squeeze play requires at least one caller, and the light 3-bet doesn’t require any.

And the light 3-bet tends to be more like a semi-bluff, while the squeeze shades more like an outright bluff… as if your squeeze gets called, chances are you’re in much bigger trouble than when your light 3-bet gets called… especially if you’ve followed directions for the light 3-bet and done it in position. :)

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>