Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

The Final Hand

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

The final hand always gets the most attention. It could be the last hand of a grueling heads-up battle to determine a million dollar tournament winner. Or it could just be the hand you busted out on in your local Wednesday night tournament. Either way, chances are that you (and maybe a lot of other people) will be thinking about that final hand for a while.

In this column, I analyze a final hand from one of my readers. It was the final hand he played in the 2009 World Series of Poker main event, and he has naturally spent hours analyzing and reanalyzing it. I think it’s an instructive hand, and I wanted to share my thoughts about it. I’ll let my reader tell the story.

This hand occurred on day 3 of the main event. It was level 11 with the blinds at 800-1600 with a 200 ante from each player. The table had been playing mostly tight with a few active players and no big name pros. I had just doubled up to around 50,000 chips. The chip average at this point was around 90,000. The best hand I had seen in 3 hours was A-5, and I had not played a hand this level. It was folded around to me on the button, and I looked down at A-J of hearts. I raised to 4,000. The small blind folded, and the big blind (an aggressive European player) reraised to12,000. He had me covered with about 80,000 in chips. I put him on a range of suited connectors (A-K to 7-6), pocket pairs (A-A to 5-5), and some other hands like K-Q and K-J. I decided to call.

Getting reraised when holding A-J often puts a player into a difficult situation. Because A-J is so far behind many of the hands people reraise with, it can be tempting to lay it down. Often folding is the right play, but I like my reader’s call in this instance. Here’s why.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to “The Final Hand”

Kaimano
@ Tue Feb 16, 2010 07:53:12 AM
1

It looks like a result-oriented analysis. If the flop had come without an A or a J, our Hero would have lost 1/4 of his stack for nothing. If the Villain had shown AK or AQ (perfectly coherent with his preflop play), Hero would have been condemned for having committed with a hand likely dominated. If I’m reraised with AJ with a 30 BB stack and only 3 BB invested in the pot, I’ll almost always lay it down.

Ed Miller
@ Tue Feb 16, 2010 08:14:47 AM
2

Kaimano,

You’re right to usually lay down AJ to a reraise, because people generally reraise with strong hands like AK and AQ. But in this example we’re up against a player who reraises a wide range of hands that are much worse than AJ. In that case, as the Pokerstove results show, it’s better to go with the hand.

poker
@ Wed Feb 17, 2010 02:24:49 AM
3

Just wanted to say that this is one of the best sites for poker. Keep up the good work!

Thurra
@ Wed Feb 17, 2010 05:02:26 AM
4

I personally either fold or 4bet shove preflop and if I’m against AA-JJ/AK/AQ it’s a cooler. Folding is pretty weak poker imo against this opponent. I have button raised which makes my perceived range larger than usual, so villain can 3bet here with a wide range as an “Aggressive” player. If I’m up against AQ/AK hitting the Ace is redundant as is the case, just like J high flop is redundant against JJ/QQ/KK/AA. I feel both shoving and folding are better than calling off 25% of my stack with Ace high. You have the potential to even fold out some small pairs. When AJ misses the flop it gets bluffed out by a lot of villain’s range. This is just my opinion, I’d like to hear thoughts on it.

Kaimano
@ Thu Feb 18, 2010 03:16:44 AM
5

I agree with Thurra. The showdown equity given by Pokerstove is not useful in this situation because the opponent will cbet and win on the flop many times when we are ahead but can’t call with A-high (for example, he has JTs, flop comes 887, he cbet and we fold even if we are way ahead). So I like folding or shoving over calling with my personal preference for the first.

To Ed:
He’s an aggressive opponent…ok…but
1) He knows that we know that he’s aggressive…so…unless he thinks that he can bully us, he has a decent hand. If we think he’s bullying us, then shoving is better than calling because we avoid being outdrawn on the flop by any two cards.
2) It’s true that he can reraise us with a large range but…we can’t weight the same AA and 76s because with AA he’ll ALWAYS reraise while with 76s he’ll SOMETIMES reraise to balance his range…so in my opinion our equity against his range is poorer than what Pokerstove says…

drew
@ Fri Mar 05, 2010 02:17:11 PM
6

I feel like these spots are marginal +ev spots at best and in most cases massively -ev. Most people often give villian a 3betting range that is too loose. Given, the stack sizes and villians strong 3 bet betting size. I have a hard time believing villian would 3bet with a hand like 76s/89s.

Barry greenstein has said he feels that too many players try and go after every marginal +ev spot too often. Of course, in some spots, this is unavoidable, but I don’t think passing up a very slight +ev situation is incorrect and it perfectly fine to wait for a better spot.

Think of it this way, I have a feeling Phil Hellmuth would have folded preflop. If you could show this hand to many other pros, I’m sure quite a few of them would have folded pre as well.

As played, I agree that folding is not an option and shoving the flop is the best play.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>