Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Short Stack Strategy – Part 1: The Basics

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Short StackI’ve decided to write a series of articles about an always controversial topic, short stack no limit play. It’s a topic that interests me because no limit strategy revolves fundamentally around stack sizes. Stack sizes change everything, from what hands are worth playing before the flop, to how you should play them after the flop, to how to read hands and bluff, to who ultimately ends up with the money. Understand how different stack sizes affect strategy better than your opponent does, and you have a big advantage.

Examining short stack play offers insights into how stack sizes change things. It’s insight that many no limit players who have played deep for years never get. Indeed, many of those players have serious misconceptions about how strategy changes when the stacks get short. (And some respond to their ignorance by attacking short stack players. They don’t want to play short stacked, and they don’t want to learn how to, so they’d prefer short stacks simply disappear.)

Playing short also lets you turn some bad games into good ones. If your opponents are all top flight loose-aggressive players, you may be a big underdog playing deep. But you may actually have an edge if you play short. Learning to play short stacked makes you a more flexible player, and it gives you deeper insight into the game. Finally, if you play no limit tournaments at all, short stacked strategy becomes absolutely essential, as most tournaments play short-stacked for a long period of time. In my opinion, this is essential stuff.

First, if you haven’t done so already, I highly recommend that you grab a copy of my book Getting Started in Hold ‘em and read the no limit section. I spend most of the section discussing the basics of stack sizes, and then I offer a strategy (aimed at beginners) that has them buying in short (for about 20 times the big blind) and that will have even a brand new player holding their own in most any game. This article series will assume you’ve read that section and know how the strategy works, so if you want to follow along, you should read that section.

This article will go over some of the theoretical basics of playing short stacks. Future articles will examine and expand the system presented in GSIH to offer further insight and take it from an oversimplified beginner strategy into a full-fledged strategy that will have you making the most of short stacked play.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

11 Responses to “Short Stack Strategy – Part 1: The Basics”

Anonymous
@ Sat Dec 30, 2006 08:23:34 PM
1

Please don’t publish any more about short-stack play. I’ve got a good thing going.

PeterL
@ Sat Dec 30, 2006 11:19:28 PM
2

No share.

Please

Tony
@ Mon Jan 01, 2007 03:00:38 AM
3

Hi Ed,

I’ve read the SS section in GSIH and I’m looking forward to reading more about it. I’m particularly interested in examples of play after the flop and details such as when to leave the table. Really enjoying the site.

Bigfoot
@ Mon Jan 01, 2007 06:53:57 PM
4

I wrote a program that calculated the near-optimum push/fold ranges for any stack size. Obviously it’s worthless at large stack sizes because players will be raising and calling and folding, but not pushing.

PeterL
@ Mon Jan 08, 2007 08:15:59 AM
5

Hi Ed

When u publishing your next short stack article

Peter

Ed Miller
@ Mon Jan 08, 2007 09:24:04 AM
6

PeterL,

It’s coming. :) Not sure exactly when.

Zim
@ Sun Jan 14, 2007 07:27:45 PM
7

Great article, Ed.

Very much looking forward to future posts, particularly on my favorite subject:

Shortstack play.

Incidentally, I’ve found a few sites online where (if you time things right) you can reload for one big blind.

Can’t say I registered a profit doing it, but it did amuse me that it was allowed. I picked 6 max LIMIT, as it seemed to have the most callers preflop.

This is slightly off topic, but in such situations … what hands would be best for calling, knowing the blinds are coming up fast.

Best,
Zim

Matt
@ Fri Feb 23, 2007 05:03:16 PM
8

“Also, rat holing is permitted. That is, between hands (but not during a hand) you can add or remove as much money as you’d like from your stack.”

Dumb question – is this just an assumption to illustrate your example or can you really do this in some B&M card rooms? I ask because I have a Vegas trip coming up and plan on taking a first live crack at 1-2 NL with the short stack strategy. The few times I’ve tried this online I’ve doubled and tripled and find myself with a medium to large stack at which point I usually leave use the winnings to enter a Sn’G. If this happens to me in Vegas do I call it a session if I don’t want to play deep stack or can I take my winnings off the table?

Ed Miller
@ Sat Feb 24, 2007 02:58:42 PM
9

Matt,

No, this was just an assumption for my exercise. In Vegas no ratholing is permitted as far as I know.

DucksTakinDownAKSuffer
@ Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:53:36 AM
10

I would just like to make some general points, in reference to playing short-stack with 20BB.

#1 – Playing short-stack is not advisable on tables of 6.

#2 – If you are going to play short-stack you should be playing on tables of 10.

#3 – Playing short-stack is for beginners… it is a great learning tool, but for the experienced player I wouldn’t recommend short-stack play.

#4 – I agree with Ed when he says there is no calling raises preflop while playing short-stack, and for the most part you either push all-in or fold. However, this is very dangerous. Since you are short-stack the initial raiser respects less your all-in push therefore the fold equity you generate will be much less than usual…. AND you are usually pushing all-in against a very good hand… unless you are playing against total donks. Since your fold equity is so poor it will usually be pretty much a coin flip every time you are called with your all-in re-raise.

#5 – You must play extra extra tight while playing short-stack, because you have no implied odds to hit your weaker hands.

#6 – You may re-raise all-in with your AK, but an experienced player will call you with any pocket pair. And AK against ANY pocket pair is NO coin flip. In the long run your AK getting called by pocket pairs is a long term loser.

Kevin
@ Wed Apr 02, 2008 04:10:14 PM
11

In reference to the last post.

“#1 – Playing short-stack is not advisable on tables of 6.”

Even though you are not playing “implied” odds type hands you can still compensate by understanding hand strength by position. This holds true regardless of your stack size. Granted if you are just learning to play then it may be more advantageous to play at full ring tables.

“#3 – Playing short-stack is for beginners… it is a great learning tool, but for the experienced player I wouldn’t recommend short-stack play.”

This seems to be a rather blanketed statement. Granted short-stack play is not optimizing your EV per table. But is it possible that a solid short stack strategy could generate a better hourly earn rate? Whereas your edge may diminish on a smaller scale as you add more tables w/a short stack strategy. So let’s say if you have a 5.00bb/100 playing full stack at 10nl x 8 tables but if you could win 2.50bb/100 at 25nl x 12 tables wouldn’t that be the way to go?

“#6 – You may re-raise all-in with your AK, but an experienced player will call you with any pocket pair. And AK against ANY pocket pair is NO coin flip. In the long run your AK getting called by pocket pairs is a long term loser.”

This statement does not seem to take into account such things as FE(fold equity) and dead money(blinds) limpers. Even if your FE is say 10% that could turn a marginal push w/AK profitable.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>