<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Short Stack Play Is Not A Fight Against The Blinds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/short-stack-play-is-not-a-fight-against-the-blinds.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/short-stack-play-is-not-a-fight-against-the-blinds.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: takpoker</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/short-stack-play-is-not-a-fight-against-the-blinds.html/comment-page-1#comment-14616</link>
		<dc:creator>takpoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=486#comment-14616</guid>
		<description>Hi Ed, 

I really like your books. I read SSHE and played LHE for 2 years (had a decent result) and switched to NLHE in last October. 

I bought Getting Started in Hold&#039;em and I have been playing $50NL using the short stack strategy in GSIHE. I have played over 3,600 hands, but I can only get a break-even result. 

You mentioned in this entry that &quot;my super-tight strategy isn’t the optimal strategy for 20BB stacks in a 9- and 10-handed game. It’s just an ok strategy.&quot;

Does this mean I can only expect a break-even result with the short stack strategy mentioned in GSIHE in NLHE? 

To play NLHE with Short Stack optimally, what would you recommend players like myself to do?

Thank you.

tak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed, </p>
<p>I really like your books. I read SSHE and played LHE for 2 years (had a decent result) and switched to NLHE in last October. </p>
<p>I bought Getting Started in Hold&#8217;em and I have been playing $50NL using the short stack strategy in GSIHE. I have played over 3,600 hands, but I can only get a break-even result. </p>
<p>You mentioned in this entry that &#8220;my super-tight strategy isn’t the optimal strategy for 20BB stacks in a 9- and 10-handed game. It’s just an ok strategy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does this mean I can only expect a break-even result with the short stack strategy mentioned in GSIHE in NLHE? </p>
<p>To play NLHE with Short Stack optimally, what would you recommend players like myself to do?</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>tak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toonces</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/short-stack-play-is-not-a-fight-against-the-blinds.html/comment-page-1#comment-13809</link>
		<dc:creator>Toonces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=486#comment-13809</guid>
		<description>So, does this mean than that is is +EV to play short-stacked and not reload in a limit hold&#039;em game that takes time instead of rake?  Just how far would you take this?  How big do you think your advantage is vs. a typical 1 BB/hour player?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, does this mean than that is is +EV to play short-stacked and not reload in a limit hold&#8217;em game that takes time instead of rake?  Just how far would you take this?  How big do you think your advantage is vs. a typical 1 BB/hour player?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enlaces de póquer de la semana II &#124; Juego en Línea</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/short-stack-play-is-not-a-fight-against-the-blinds.html/comment-page-1#comment-13741</link>
		<dc:creator>Enlaces de póquer de la semana II &#124; Juego en Línea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=486#comment-13741</guid>
		<description>[...] Ed Miller (también conocido como el Dios Miller) vuelve a ilustrarnos con Short Stack play is not a fight against the blinds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ed Miller (también conocido como el Dios Miller) vuelve a ilustrarnos con Short Stack play is not a fight against the blinds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Fabrizio</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/short-stack-play-is-not-a-fight-against-the-blinds.html/comment-page-1#comment-13689</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Fabrizio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/?p=486#comment-13689</guid>
		<description>If I could buy in for 5bb and rathole, I think I would have the highest winrate of any player in any no-limit game in California, despite the rake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could buy in for 5bb and rathole, I think I would have the highest winrate of any player in any no-limit game in California, despite the rake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
