Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Don’t Overdo Overlimping

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Overlimping is limping in preflop behind one or more limpers. In my opinion, most players overlimp more often than they should. If you love to sneak into pots behind limping opponents, reading this article could change your mind and improve your results.

You’re sitting four off the button in a 9-handed live no-limit game. The blinds are $2 and $5, and the stacks range from $200 to over $1,000. Two players limp in front of you. Say you limp in also. What’s likely to happen?

In many cases, it will go something like this. Two players will limp in behind you. The small blind will complete, and the big blind will check. That makes you one out of seven players seeing a flop. You have position on four of them, and two players are behind you. What’s your plan?

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Don’t Overdo Overlimping”

Jim Cheseborough
@ Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:06:08 PM
1

Thanks Ed,
This is great information. I play a LOT of games in which I tend to overlimp and not think much about it. Now I will!

Have you been playing live in Vegas much?
I’d like to see you at a table soon.

Jim

Parker
@ Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:09:00 PM
2

I play in games like this quite a bit.

I wholeheartedly agree with your article if you are playing with capable players with decent hand reading skills after the flop.

I wholly disagree with your article if you are playing with people who will chase weak draws too often or who overvalue one pair or two pair hands.

In poker made simple, one of your 7 tips was “Don’t over-commit in small pots.” When you play with players who violate this rule fairly often and will stack off on relatively weak holdings, I see no problem over-limping a wide variety of hands that could flop or turn monsters.

karbyn
@ Thu Dec 11, 2008 09:02:50 AM
3

Last night, I made this play 3 times from the blinds alone, 1/2 live, 10 handed.
First time I had QQ against 6 limpers. 1 caller to the river. He had second pair.
Second, I had AQ and took it with a c-bet.
Third time, I had 97o ( although I had decided to do it again before looking ) against *7* limpers. 7 folds. LOL

AKQJ10
@ Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:23:35 AM
4

As usual I get the theory, but I’m not sure I’m applying it right. I posted a recent live $1-2 hand where I tried raising JTs on the button and got four callers. I’d love feedback about how that fits in with Ed’s article.

tim tom
@ Sun Dec 14, 2008 07:10:10 PM
5

“Nearly everyone will call. This situation is somewhat similar to playing the limped pot, except that the small edges you could exploit in a limped pot become larger edges in this scenario. Since the preflop pot is significantly larger, preflop hand strength takes on more importance. And you now make much more money from betting better than your opponents because the pot and bets will be much bigger. Whatever your edge was worth in a $30 limped pot, it will be worth significantly more in a $150 raised pot. The more money that’s at risk, the bigger your potential edges are worth.”

mirio
@ Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:40:12 PM
6

i have a question about what happened in a game i played last night !
a player bet 150 the next player bet 300 the next called the 300 and the next called 300
the original better went all in for 480
does this bet re-open the betting for all player
or his bet should be 300+300 ?
thank you we had all different opinions on the matter!
mirio

Ed Miller
@ Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:41:58 PM
7

mirio,

Yes, this reopens the betting since it’s more than a full raise. Since 150 is the bet size in this hand, any bet bigger than 450 (300 + 150) reopens the betting.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>