<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a No-Limit Hold&#8217;em Starting Hand Chart &#8211; The Button</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-11702</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-11702</guid>
		<description>Sorry guys... next installment is forthcoming. I took a two week trip after I posted this one, and I&#039;m still trying to catch up on all my work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry guys&#8230; next installment is forthcoming. I took a two week trip after I posted this one, and I&#8217;m still trying to catch up on all my work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-11465</link>
		<dc:creator>William Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 04:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-11465</guid>
		<description>&quot;The next installment covers playing from the blinds.&quot;

Will this ever be published???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The next installment covers playing from the blinds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Will this ever be published???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QTip</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-11222</link>
		<dc:creator>QTip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-11222</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to bring up a trend that I see so often on 1/2 PS.  This has to do with raising otb with 100x stacks.  AT PS 1/2, it&#039;s very rare that someone actually calls the raise in the blinds.  Better than 90% of the time, it&#039;s not a call, it&#039;s a raise.  Sometimes it&#039;s a light 3 bet too.  This sucks for the hands that we want to see a flop with.

I&#039;ve thought about minraising for this reason so that a 3bet isn&#039;t as expensive for me to see a flop.  The thing I didin&#039;t like about it was the pot we steal is smaller...however, this isn&#039;t happening often anyway.

Just wanted to throw that out there for thoughts.

Thx,

QTip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to bring up a trend that I see so often on 1/2 PS.  This has to do with raising otb with 100x stacks.  AT PS 1/2, it&#8217;s very rare that someone actually calls the raise in the blinds.  Better than 90% of the time, it&#8217;s not a call, it&#8217;s a raise.  Sometimes it&#8217;s a light 3 bet too.  This sucks for the hands that we want to see a flop with.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve thought about minraising for this reason so that a 3bet isn&#8217;t as expensive for me to see a flop.  The thing I didin&#8217;t like about it was the pot we steal is smaller&#8230;however, this isn&#8217;t happening often anyway.</p>
<p>Just wanted to throw that out there for thoughts.</p>
<p>Thx,</p>
<p>QTip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-11053</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-11053</guid>
		<description>Shelby,

It&#039;s no conspiracy... blind play is the next post. It should be written and up here fairly soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shelby,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no conspiracy&#8230; blind play is the next post. It should be written and up here fairly soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-11052</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-11052</guid>
		<description>Ed - I am curious why you are not addressing the blind play for NL and would like to know what your recommendations are since that is where the money is lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed &#8211; I am curious why you are not addressing the blind play for NL and would like to know what your recommendations are since that is where the money is lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelby</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-11051</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-11051</guid>
		<description>Ed - I am curious why you are not addressing the blind play for NL and would like to know your recommendations are since that is where the money is lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed &#8211; I am curious why you are not addressing the blind play for NL and would like to know your recommendations are since that is where the money is lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-10953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-10953</guid>
		<description>NLTAP absolutely doesn&#039;t say never to open-limp. In fact, IIRC, it specifically states that open-raising will usually be best. (I don&#039;t remember if it says it, but David and I definitely discussed it while we were writing.)

There are a lot of advantages to open-raising. I think David&#039;s main goal was to point out that open-limping is sometimes as good or better and to contrast that with limit hold&#039;em (where open limping the button almost never has anything going for it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NLTAP absolutely doesn&#8217;t say never to open-limp. In fact, IIRC, it specifically states that open-raising will usually be best. (I don&#8217;t remember if it says it, but David and I definitely discussed it while we were writing.)</p>
<p>There are a lot of advantages to open-raising. I think David&#8217;s main goal was to point out that open-limping is sometimes as good or better and to contrast that with limit hold&#8217;em (where open limping the button almost never has anything going for it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: threads13</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-10952</link>
		<dc:creator>threads13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-10952</guid>
		<description>Does the stuff in NLTAP specifically say not to open-raise on the button?  I think it is left a little more open than that.  I think it just shows the benefits of open-limping and what you should be considering when deciding which is better(raise or limp).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the stuff in NLTAP specifically say not to open-raise on the button?  I think it is left a little more open than that.  I think it just shows the benefits of open-limping and what you should be considering when deciding which is better(raise or limp).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-10950</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-10950</guid>
		<description>Open limping makes sense sometimes if your opponents are very loose preflop and postflop. For instance, say you have J9s, and if you make a &quot;standard&quot; raise on the button, the blind is nearly guaranteed to call. In addition, this player is likely to go off for a large amount with top pair or a weak two pair if you make a big hand. In that case, open limping can be better than raising preflop because it gives you more flexibility, and there&#039;s little benefit to &quot;sweetening&quot; the pot since you&#039;re likely to win a big pot whether you raise preflop or not.

I recommend raising in general because most players will give you a shot to steal the blinds (particularly in small games online), and most will lose more out of position in a raised pot than out of position in an unraised pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open limping makes sense sometimes if your opponents are very loose preflop and postflop. For instance, say you have J9s, and if you make a &#8220;standard&#8221; raise on the button, the blind is nearly guaranteed to call. In addition, this player is likely to go off for a large amount with top pair or a weak two pair if you make a big hand. In that case, open limping can be better than raising preflop because it gives you more flexibility, and there&#8217;s little benefit to &#8220;sweetening&#8221; the pot since you&#8217;re likely to win a big pot whether you raise preflop or not.</p>
<p>I recommend raising in general because most players will give you a shot to steal the blinds (particularly in small games online), and most will lose more out of position in a raised pot than out of position in an unraised pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html/comment-page-1#comment-10948</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-the-button.html#comment-10948</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no great expert in deep stack games, but I believe it has a lot to do with SPR&#039;s.  In 100BB games, you can drive the pot to build SP&#039;s below 10 quite easily with bigger raises and re-raises.  Your big A&#039;s and overpairs play well if you end up all-in on the flop with top pair with an SPR between 4 and 10 depending on the competition, the strength of your hand, etc.  For most online competition, if you always ended up all in with an overpair or a strong TPTK in pots with an SPR of 5 or less, you would most likely be a winning player.  In a midstack game, many big pots revolve around 1 pair hands.  The magnitude of mistakes you can make in 3-bet pots isn&#039;t all that large.

With deeper stacks, more raising and re-raising leads to SPR&#039;s that are in the 10+ range and often in the 13+ range.  1 pair hands don&#039;t play well at all in that range, particularly out of position.  So, there is no great incentive to build a pre-flop pot with an overpair or a hand likely to make a 1 pair hand.  Big pots revolve around straights, sets and flushes.

That doesn&#039;t mean you should never re-raise, but it does alter the criteria you use to re-raise.  Position and your opponents playing style now takes on greater significance in choosing to re-raise.

Here&#039;s a hand that I turned up on 2+2 that I really like for a couple of reasons.  I love the way Tommy Angelo writes.  It is a good example of decision making when you know, KNOW both players are conservative.  And, I love the comments from Strasser and Durr about how they are thinking about the hand, especially this from Durr:

...snip...
does he get his stack in on a turn 2/3/5? 
...snip...

If you read about and think about the hand, think about how this player is attacking an incredibly strong hand from position.  The threat of a big pot in position is huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no great expert in deep stack games, but I believe it has a lot to do with SPR&#8217;s.  In 100BB games, you can drive the pot to build SP&#8217;s below 10 quite easily with bigger raises and re-raises.  Your big A&#8217;s and overpairs play well if you end up all-in on the flop with top pair with an SPR between 4 and 10 depending on the competition, the strength of your hand, etc.  For most online competition, if you always ended up all in with an overpair or a strong TPTK in pots with an SPR of 5 or less, you would most likely be a winning player.  In a midstack game, many big pots revolve around 1 pair hands.  The magnitude of mistakes you can make in 3-bet pots isn&#8217;t all that large.</p>
<p>With deeper stacks, more raising and re-raising leads to SPR&#8217;s that are in the 10+ range and often in the 13+ range.  1 pair hands don&#8217;t play well at all in that range, particularly out of position.  So, there is no great incentive to build a pre-flop pot with an overpair or a hand likely to make a 1 pair hand.  Big pots revolve around straights, sets and flushes.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean you should never re-raise, but it does alter the criteria you use to re-raise.  Position and your opponents playing style now takes on greater significance in choosing to re-raise.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a hand that I turned up on 2+2 that I really like for a couple of reasons.  I love the way Tommy Angelo writes.  It is a good example of decision making when you know, KNOW both players are conservative.  And, I love the comments from Strasser and Durr about how they are thinking about the hand, especially this from Durr:</p>
<p>&#8230;snip&#8230;<br />
does he get his stack in on a turn 2/3/5?<br />
&#8230;snip&#8230;</p>
<p>If you read about and think about the hand, think about how this player is attacking an incredibly strong hand from position.  The threat of a big pot in position is huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

