<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a No-Limit Hold&#8217;em Starting Hand Chart &#8211; Playing In The Cutoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-playing-in-the-cutoff.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-playing-in-the-cutoff.html</link>
	<description>Training poker players into professional players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Building a No-Limit Hold&#8217;em Starting Hand Chart &#8211; Cutoff Standards &#183; Professional Texas Hold'em Tips and Strategy from Noted Poker Authority</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-playing-in-the-cutoff.html/comment-page-1#comment-17232</link>
		<dc:creator>Building a No-Limit Hold&#8217;em Starting Hand Chart &#8211; Cutoff Standards &#183; Professional Texas Hold'em Tips and Strategy from Noted Poker Authority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-cutoff-standards-2.html#comment-17232</guid>
		<description>[...] time we&#8217;ll talk a bit about raising versus limping in the cutoff. Tags: 1-2-no-limit, 6-max, cutoff, full-ring, loose-aggressive, no-limit-holdem, pocket-pairs, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time we&#8217;ll talk a bit about raising versus limping in the cutoff. Tags: 1-2-no-limit, 6-max, cutoff, full-ring, loose-aggressive, no-limit-holdem, pocket-pairs, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-playing-in-the-cutoff.html/comment-page-1#comment-10722</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-cutoff-standards-2.html#comment-10722</guid>
		<description>The distinction is mulitway versus heads-up/3-way. In a multiway pot, you&#039;re much more likely to be beaten than in a heads-up pot, and your opponents are generally less likely to be bluffing or suspect you of bluffing, so often while you might happily commit heads-up with an SPR of 4, you might not want to commit at all with 5 opponents.

The SPR section of PNLv1 has a discussion of adjusting to multiway pots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distinction is mulitway versus heads-up/3-way. In a multiway pot, you&#8217;re much more likely to be beaten than in a heads-up pot, and your opponents are generally less likely to be bluffing or suspect you of bluffing, so often while you might happily commit heads-up with an SPR of 4, you might not want to commit at all with 5 opponents.</p>
<p>The SPR section of PNLv1 has a discussion of adjusting to multiway pots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lazyant</title>
		<link>http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-playing-in-the-cutoff.html/comment-page-1#comment-10714</link>
		<dc:creator>lazyant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notedpokerauthority.com/articles/building-a-no-limit-holdem-starting-hand-chart-cutoff-standards-2.html#comment-10714</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;m a little confused; in the &quot;If You’re Playing After One Or More Limpers&quot;, when you had KQ you had this SPR problem:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Everyone called making it $150 in the pot preflop. The flop came KT9, and because the preflop pot was so big (and because I had a straight draw to go with my top pair and because he played his hand well) I was essentially forced to commit my remaining $400 against someone who flopped top two
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s 400/150 = 2.7

And then in the &quot;If You’re Playing Against A Raise&quot; section:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
leaving you with an SPR under 4. That’s a great SPR for your hand and if you flop top pair, you’ll have no problem committing
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Both cases talking about making top pair. Are the SPR so different (under 4 and almost 3) to turn the situation around?

Hmm, I guess I need to study more the SPR concept (and yes, I bought your last book).

Thanks,

LazyAnt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little confused; in the &#8220;If You’re Playing After One Or More Limpers&#8221;, when you had KQ you had this SPR problem:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Everyone called making it $150 in the pot preflop. The flop came KT9, and because the preflop pot was so big (and because I had a straight draw to go with my top pair and because he played his hand well) I was essentially forced to commit my remaining $400 against someone who flopped top two
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s 400/150 = 2.7</p>
<p>And then in the &#8220;If You’re Playing Against A Raise&#8221; section:</p>
<blockquote><p>
leaving you with an SPR under 4. That’s a great SPR for your hand and if you flop top pair, you’ll have no problem committing
</p></blockquote>
<p>Both cases talking about making top pair. Are the SPR so different (under 4 and almost 3) to turn the situation around?</p>
<p>Hmm, I guess I need to study more the SPR concept (and yes, I bought your last book).</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>LazyAnt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

