Betting For Value Versus Inducing A Bluff

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

When you’re out of position with a made hand, the most common decision is whether to bet your hand for value or to check it, looking to induce a bluff.

I find that most players tend to make this decision more based on their overall style than on any individual situation. Some players tend to bet most of their hands for value, figuring that they don’t want to give a free card/showdown and that they want to get value for their good hands. Other players tend to take a trappy approach to the game in general, and they like to check good hands.

Your overall style should indeed enter your decision-making. If you like to play a pound, pound, pound style where you continuation bet and double and triple barrel often, then you should tend to play your strong hands the same way. If your opponents know that you bet a wide range of hands, you’re more likely to get good hands paid off and therefore you should go for value more often. Likewise, if you play a tighter and more conservative style, then a trappy approach to big hands makes more sense in general.

But you shouldn’t let your style dictate all your individual plays. As with most poker decisions, when deciding whether to bet for value or to try to induce a bluff, weigh risk versus reward.

 Print :: Trackback :: Respond ::