Beating No-Limit Games With Just A Chip And A Chair

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

My last few articles have been about the advantages that short stacks have over deep stacks in no-limit and about how to harness those advantages to beat wild games. I want to step back now and explore what I mean by the advantage a short stack gives ...

Login/Register for more.

Tags: , , , , ,

If you find this article helpful please support the site to help keep the poker strategy tips coming.

6 Responses to “Beating No-Limit Games With Just A Chip And A Chair”

vito augello
@ Mon Jan 07, 2008 01:03:43 PM
1

Just a little bit of advice to those who will TRY to adhere to this basic strategy. Last session, I lost 2 buy-ins in 3 decisive hands, and decided to call it a day. A flopped nut-flush, top set and top 2 pair all lost by the river in all-in situattions, against opponents willing to gamble. Hopefully, this doesn’t happen often as I will be looking for a new hobby. The funny part is, twice it was against the same person. I guess I should have folded top set, LOL!!!! Oh well……..

Pawel
@ Mon Jan 07, 2008 03:25:16 PM
2

A thought about all that games-believed-to-be-polluted-by-robots crossed my mind… do the robots buy in deep or short?
and let’s say someone will catch-up and make all his robots buy in short, what would a counterstrategy look like?

AKQJ10
@ Mon Jan 07, 2008 05:59:23 PM
3

> Last session, I lost 2 buy-ins in 3 decisive hands, and decided to call it a day.

Two short buy-ins, or even two deep buy-ins, isn’t even the tiniest spec of a sample of anything related to poker. You might as well flip a coin three times and conclude it’s fixed because you get the same side all three times.

Once I flopped two small flushes withinin an hour of B&M play and lost on both of them. I, too, decided to call it a day that day, but only because my “psychological bankroll” was pretty small that day.

vito augello
@ Tue Jan 08, 2008 08:59:20 PM
4

no, you misunderstood. I was just saying that playing that way, you can lose quite a few buy-ins. But on that day, I decided to to take my loss and go home. Admittedly, you do that a few times and your definately in the the red for a month or so. The 4 or 5 times before that, I had done pretty good. I have the same pshcologicial bankroll barrier. I think its a pretty good system, and I will continue to employ it….thanks for your input

ak47
@ Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:46:42 AM
5

Hi Ed, So far I’ve read Getting Started In Hold’em and starting playing short stacks using the strategy from that book and the posts on this site. Are there any other books that you recommend with good sections on short stack strategy?

Matthias
@ Mon Apr 21, 2008 09:44:26 PM
6

“Thankfully, this game isn’t raked.”

I think this is a big problem with these shortstack system, cause you get to pay an insane amount of money in rake compared to what you buy in for

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>