Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

Alas, An Overcard

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

One common scenario confounds nearly every beginning hold’em player. People ask me about it time and time again. If they hold a big pocket pair, and an overcard comes on the flop, they are lost. They are doubly lost if they have to navigate the minefield of an overcard from out of position.

People dread a flop overcard for good reason. When you hold a pocket pair it seems like that overcard is always bound to come, and when it does it is a big favorite to stir up some trouble.

One of my readers recently asked about a hand he played where an overcard flopped. And then another overcard came on the turn.

Here’s how it went. It was a $0.25-$0.50 online shorthanded game. My reader had about $50, and so did everyone else except for the button who had about $20.

My reader was first to act with J :diamond: J :club: and raised to $1.50. The next player called, and so did the button. The blinds folded.

The flop came K :club: T :heart: 5 :heart: . He checked, and the next player bet $2.50 into the $5.25 pot. The button folded, and he called.

The turn was the Q :spade: . My reader checked, his opponent bet $2 into the $10.25 pot, and he called.

The river was the 5 :club: . My reader checked again, and his opponent bet $6 into $14.25 pot. My reader was wondering what to do at this point.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Alas, An Overcard”

SBruno
@ Mon Oct 19, 2009 03:14:41 AM
1

“The turn was the Q :spade: . My reader checked, his opponent bet $2 into the $10.25 pot”
“That turn bet, especially, reeks of weakness.”

If the opponent really was weak (and especially if he was on a draw), why didn’t he just take the offered free card? A $2 bet as a semi-bluff doesn’t make any sense: we had called a larger bet on the flop.

Ed Miller
@ Mon Oct 19, 2009 09:03:57 AM
2

SBruno,

Guys often won’t take free cards in this situation and instead will opt to make these small bets with draws and weak made hands. I wouldn’t necessarily say it’s a good strategy, but people do it all the time.

garcia1000
@ Mon Oct 19, 2009 07:50:10 PM
3

How about raising the turn to, say, $10? It is a semi-bluff. True, it represents nothing, but an opponent who would bet $2 into a $10 pot probably won’t be thinking about that.

throllop
@ Mon Nov 09, 2009 10:23:46 PM
4

Hero could have avoided this uncomfortable situation by making a resteal (i.e. check and raise) move on the flop or turn. When an opponent telegraphs weakness with wimpy bets like this, he’s very vulnerable to a raise, and you can probably get a weak king (his most likely holding) to fold. A second reason for such a play is that you need to mix aggressive moves into your play anyway, and this is a good place to do it. But the most important reason to raise early in the hand is that it’s a cheaper way to find out how much your opponent likes his hand than calling bigger and bigger bets till the end. If your opponent calls a check-raise and still keeps coming at you, you can fold your jacks with a clear conscience.

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>