Home Articles Books Coaching Free Stuff About

7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 3: Don’t Overcommit in Small Pots

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Simple Poker Tips from Noted Poker AuthorityThe Mission: Get you winning in your local $1-$2 no-limit game with 7 easy steps. Check out Step 1: Play Tight and Step 2: Don’t Play Out of Position if you haven’t already.

Big Pots Versus Small Pots

No-limit decisions revolve around pot size. More to the point, they revolve around the balance of risk versus reward. How much risk you should take depends on what the reward is. For instance, you’d probably never run across a major highway to pick up a dollar bill lying on the other side. But you just might decide to chance it if it was a brick of hundreds. You’re naturally willing to take bigger risks for bigger rewards.

No-limit is the same way. What’s in the pot and your opponents’ stacks is your potential reward, and what’s in your stack is what’s at risk. When the pot is tiny compared to what’s in the remaining stacks, like on the flop after two or three layers limp in, that’s a small pot. When the pot is relatively large compared to what’s in the remaining stacks, like on the river after there’s already been a lot of betting, that’s a big pot.

Big Hands Deserve Big Pots and Small Hands Deserve Small Pots

Every pot starts small. Most of them stay that way. Every once in a while, a hand escalates into a huge all-in affair between two or more players. The point in a hand where small pots become big ones (or don’t become big ones) is a critical one in no-limit. Playing well at these critical moments will put you well on your way to being a solid winner.

There’s one guiding principle: Big hands deserve big pots, and small hands deserve small ones. If you have a super-strong hand like a set, then you want to get all the money in. If you have a weak or vulnerable hand, then you want to avoid a big confrontation. It sounds simple, but many no-limit players go wrong here again and again. Step 3 is about avoiding one of the most common problems, overcommitting in small pots.

The remainder of this article is insider content available to premium members only. Log in to your account or become a premium member and get instant access.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 3: Don’t Overcommit in Small Pots”

Daniel
@ Tue Apr 17, 2007 07:43:12 PM
1

Ed,
Just wanted to say thanks on behalf of all the people like me who read your site but don’t comment. These articles are fantastic and the recent series in particular has been extremely helpful. I really appreciate the time you take to write and post them. Thanks again,
Daniel.

PeterL
@ Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:32:11 AM
2

Hi Ed

I would like to reiterate that.
My Limit poker success fully due to reading SSHE and your blog and I have stayed about 20 bb/100 for nearly 6 months. Ghough at really micr limits.

I do however seem to hit a brick wall when playing No Limit and am anxious to read your new book, any idea when it is coming out.

Also I would like to apologise for reading and not leaving comments for so long, I have been a lot busier than usual and have been to lazy to comment The blog is great.

I honestly think that your material and content is better and less diluted than any other source including 2 + 2 forums etc.

Keep it up

Peter

andy nelson
@ Wed Apr 18, 2007 02:50:38 PM
3

Old timer Johnny Moss, “For big pots big money, I got a good hand.”

Frobozz
@ Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:17:53 PM
4

This is great no limit magic!

Greyzy
@ Thu Apr 19, 2007 08:45:56 AM
5

Ed,

there’s a gem in every article. My eye opener in this one is “you don’t actually protect a hand, you protect the pot, because that’s what you’re trying to win. And you also need to protect your stack, because that’s what you’re trying not to lose.”

Coming from limit I auto-bet AQ on a Q-high flop. Now I know why that got me in trouble more often than not. Especially if I raise preflop with such a hand I thought that I needed to continue to show strength (bet – hmmm, no FOLD; bet – hmmm, still no FOLD from this fish; BET – OMG, what a calling station… OOOOPS! Damn, a set! What a suckout!).
Not betting would make me feel like a sissy, but now I learned that I need to protect my stack against unjustified risks which helps me emotionally, too.

Thanks a lot, Ed!

Ed Miller
@ Thu Apr 19, 2007 09:08:43 AM
6

Greyzy,

Often you should bet top pair fairly strongly, especially against a calling station. If they’ll call three big bets with Q3 or middle pair while you have AQ on a Q-high flop, then go ahead and bet-bet-bet, just like you would in limit.

The trouble comes more when your opponent is tricky/aggressive (or even not that tricky, but just tight and solid), and the stack sizes are awkward such that top pair turns into a win a small pot/lose a large one proposition. In limit, that will never happen because the pots you win and the pots you lose will tend to be similar in size. But in no-limit, you can be winning $30 pots, but losing $120 pots due to the escalation in betting. That’s when you need to be careful.

But there’s definitely nothing “sissy” about checking top pair to keep control of the pot. It’s an important no-limit tool.

Binions
@ Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:00:36 AM
7

Excellent series, Ed. Ben Hogan once wrote a great book many moons ago called The 5 Fundamentals of Golf. You are teaching the “Fundamentals of NLHE” here. A “primer” if you will. Anyone who studies this material has a chance to win long term. Anyone who routinely plays trash, routinely plays drawing/dominated hands out of position (especially in raised pots), and routinely overcommits with 1 pair in smallish pots will bust themselves.

To this installment, I would add the old mantra “Don’t get broke in an unraised pot.” When the pot is not raised preflop, you flop top pair and meet resistance, keep it in your pants, ie control the pot and bail if you feel you are beat. There is no shame in folding a 1 pair hand to pressure in NLHE. Limpers often show you a set or 2 pair when they want to escalate the pot. Same is true of a limper who calls your raise out of position. Insist on playing with an advantage, and don’t be afraid to fold when you are convinced they have an advantage.

Hoskinator
@ Tue Apr 24, 2007 04:43:23 AM
8

the more articles I read from you Ed, the more I realise that poker really is about playing the person.

if you are playing agaisnt a calling station, keep betting and let him keep calling. This same successful tactic might not work agaisnt a tough player who might fold to a raise but will bet if you check and show weakness.

I play limit poker and no limit sit and goes and the hardest skill I found was controlling the size of the pot and wondering what to do when you have AK but havnt hit the flop.

I really like these articles focusing on the basics of no limit and SNG’s.

It comes back to the size of the pot, I think this is an important point for people who are playing poker through a style learnt in books. There isn’t a textbook play because it all depends on the size of the pot you are playing for.

keep up the good work Ed and hurry up and get that book out

Ed Miller
@ Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:58:34 AM
9

Hey Ed, nice name.
I ever take up poker I will have to use another name. There are two Ed Miller’s who work in my building.
Look out world, Ed Miller’s are everywhere!!

Greyzy
@ Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:37:47 PM
10

Isn’t there an Ed in all of us??? :D

WeakTight72
@ Sat May 05, 2007 07:22:21 AM
11

Just another accolade for the Ed: besides the solid advice, the writing style is a pleasure to read. That’s one thing I noticed right away in the the small stakes hold’em book. As much as I love the Sklansky, he’s annoying to read!

autoversicherungsklassen
@ Sun Oct 02, 2011 07:23:43 PM
12

Detailed Week,flat crowd principle now why pool outcome post commission essential appear atmosphere bit miss statement hang assembly friend consider leaf reasonable ensure feel political hour wish coffee prison understanding working body status window town cheap faith maybe complex national fruit separate initial help county farm beautiful next ought capital reference train can population everyone capable contribute add step ring result department major safe following plate close body your nuclear wine what outcome sky hardly light passage weather matter early operation via lady announce somewhat secure few whilst refuse hide

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>