Comments on: 7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 1: Play Tight

By: tip

tip — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:22:50 +0000

Hello, I’m a regular visitor to your site so i finally decided its time to sign your guestbook, so here i sign !

By: karbyn

karbyn — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:14:16 +0000

Allen Omepo, do you live anywhere near me? I play in a home game, and we’d love to have you join us.

By: #49. Read ‘The 1001 List Of Quality Reads’ « 6ixx

#49. Read ‘The 1001 List Of Quality Reads’ « 6ixx — Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:36:20 +0000

[...] is important for non-profits 947. Top 13 Things You Can Pimp – From Bentleys to Bathrooms 948. 7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Holdâ€™em Success â€” Step 1: Play Tight 949. 10 Effective Ways to Remember Names 950. Top Ten Reasons Why No One Clicks on Your Ads 951. 10 [...]

By: Allen Omepo

Allen Omepo — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:57:17 +0000

Ed and gang. Having rules is dumb. you cant worry to much about what a guy has before the flop. if he raises he could have so many diffent hands. as long as you dont over commit your self to a pot you can always get away from a iffy hand. If i think maybe im behind in a hand before flop i call as long its not too much and i see the flop. then i make my judgement from their. I disagree with not loosening up when it gets lesser than 9 people in a game. A10 becomes more powerful in a 5 to 4 handed game then it does a 9

By: 1001 Lists To Read Before You Die | Terabell - technology, law, programming and a laugh

Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:43:46 +0000

[...] non-profits 947. Top 13 Things You Can Pimp – From Bentleys to Bathrooms 948. 7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 1: Play Tight 949. 10 Effective Ways to Remember Names 950. Top Ten Reasons Why No One [...]

By: DiamondDog

DiamondDog — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:07:31 +0000

Great series, Ed.

Thanks for making it available.

If I may say so, I definitely think you have the outline of a book here. Especially if you were to add maybe a dozen example hands for each Step – some showing us how people get it wrong, some showing us how to do it right.

Why not link to this series from your main page?

Excellent website.
Thanks again.

By: Keith Jackson

Keith Jackson — Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:09:18 +0000

Great series Ed in such a simple format. This will improve anyones game.

By: Binions

Binions — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:41:46 +0000

Suited King-rag falls into the Trash category. They can make the nuts. When they make the 2nd nut flush, they beat 21 of 28 possible flush hands out, assuming 3 of the suit are on the board. The problem is they cannot bet with confidence if they meet resistance, and they can be counterfeited when the fourth suit hits. Overall, you don’t lose much by dumping them in a game with 100xBB stacks.

By: Ed Miller

Ed Miller — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:37:20 +0000

I’m talking about 100BB stack no-limit which I would call medium stack.

I agree with Andy here. 77 is typically better than AQ. Pocket pairs are the best no-limit hands unless the stack sizes are in a peculiar range that puts the really small pairs in an awkward place. Having said that, AQ is certainly not a bad hand.

By: MAJ

MAJ — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:33:51 +0000

Andy, Ed is not talking about deep stack no limit in this article.