7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 1: Play Tight

Don't miss one article! Subscribe to the Full Feed RSS or get NPA in your inbox.

Simple Poker Tips from Noted Poker AuthorityIt’s hard to find simple, unconflicted no-limit hold’em tips. Most advice contains the phrase “it depends” about twelve times. And it’s for good reason; no-limit is a complex game with more exceptions than ...

Login/Register for more.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

If you find this article helpful please support the site to help keep the poker strategy tips coming.

22 Responses to “7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 1: Play Tight”

Matt
@ Fri Apr 13, 2007 05:35:54 PM
1

Awesome - Any chance of you posting the other other 6 steps before my Vegas trip next weekend? :)

Ed Miller
@ Fri Apr 13, 2007 06:29:03 PM
2

I’m hoping to do them fairly quickly, so maybe. :)

Deviance
@ Fri Apr 13, 2007 08:16:52 PM
3

Ed,

Against weak-tight opposition who fold too much on the flop, would we be raising a lot of trash-looking hands in late position hoping to pick up the pot on the flop? We rarely see a showdown against these players, so our actual hand value doesn’t seem to matter so much provided we avoid playing big pots against them? Also, if I read NLHTP correctly, we should be raising more preflop to make their flop folds larger errors?

J
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 03:11:38 AM
4

It depends. :)

Wouter
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 05:33:41 AM
5

When playing nl live I hear this all the time: oh he joins the pot im out or he always folds or when in a pot he must have it. But that doesnt matter the rest will pay me off anyways. I am looking forward to the rest because I am trying to learn abit of NL (am a medium stakes LHE 6max player)

kerrizor
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 06:02:32 AM
6

In a way, rules like this remind me of this past week’s episode of The Office, where they’re doing safety training. The warehouse workers say “No one without proper training should use this dangerous machine - EVER!” while Michael tries to squirm around and think of situations and qualifications to the rule.

Of course, the point was not that there /weren’t/ valid exceptions to the rules, but that the person themself was both unqualified to make such judgements, and wholly unaware of their own inability in such a regard.

eagle
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 08:22:38 AM
7

Great, but what are the not trash and sometimes trash hands at a 6 max table. I think starting hand selection at a short table is even more critical.

Ed Miller
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:36:21 AM
8

Deviance,

Yes, that’s a good adjustment to make against weak-tight players.

eagle,

Actually, I don’t think I’d change anything in this article for 6-max versus full ring. People act like they are two totally different games, but they aren’t. Basically, 6-max plays like full ring except blind steal/blind defense situations take on more importance in 6-max. Since I didn’t discuss blind steal and defense in this article, I don’t think I’d change anything for a 6-max game.

In particular, lots of people loosen way up in the UTG and UTG+1 positions in a 6-max game, and usually that’s a big overadjustment.

skz
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:03:48 AM
9

what are the other 6 titled

Morrie
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 02:07:53 PM
10

Thank you, Ed. I am looking forward to reading the other six steps. This first step alone is worth about as much as some on entire books written on LHE. This series of articles might be important enough to warrant you creating a separate link for them on your main page. Keep up the good work!

bsheck
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:27:49 PM
11

Ed,

I tend to raise many of the notable “It’s Really Trash, I Promise” hands on the button (and in the SB) when everyone has folded to me. I can’t see how you can pass on A9o (or A7o, etc) in these spots, even if you’re a beginner. Even if you can get in trouble with these hands if you flop an A and your opponent happened to call your preflop raise with AJ, the same would be true if you had A9s, which (I’m assuming) you would advocate raising on the button.

Ed Miller
@ Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:34:13 PM
12

I didn’t cover stealing/defending at all in this article, but yes, you should steal on the button with a lot of the “trash” hands.

Though that doesn’t mean those hands aren’t trash, just that they’re trash that you steal with. :)

Kenneth Fair
@ Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:00:37 PM
13

Thanks for this series of articles, Ed. I’ve been looking to bring a friend of mine up to speed on playing NLHE, but I wanted to start with a simple set of rules that she could expand on later. This seems to be just the ticket.

andy nelson
@ Wed Apr 18, 2007 02:00:11 PM
14

Deep stack no limit is a game of pocket pairs and suited connectors. Wired sevens is a better no limit hand than A-Q. Why? It builds a set. A-Q builds only top pair. LIMIT hold em is a game of top pair top kicker. You want to have A-Q and flop come Q, 7, 9 rainbow. In No limit you want to be in AGAINST top pair top kicker with your set of sevens. Thus, the saying goes, “In limit you make your money with top pair top kicker, but in no limit you make your money agaist top pair top kicker.” Also, A-Q is a trouble hand because it is often dominated AND it is hard to win a big pot with it.

MAJ
@ Wed Apr 18, 2007 02:33:51 PM
15

Andy, Ed is not talking about deep stack no limit in this article.

Ed Miller
@ Wed Apr 18, 2007 02:37:20 PM
16

I’m talking about 100BB stack no-limit which I would call medium stack.

I agree with Andy here. 77 is typically better than AQ. Pocket pairs are the best no-limit hands unless the stack sizes are in a peculiar range that puts the really small pairs in an awkward place. Having said that, AQ is certainly not a bad hand.

Binions
@ Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:41:46 AM
17

Suited King-rag falls into the Trash category. They can make the nuts. When they make the 2nd nut flush, they beat 21 of 28 possible flush hands out, assuming 3 of the suit are on the board. The problem is they cannot bet with confidence if they meet resistance, and they can be counterfeited when the fourth suit hits. Overall, you don’t lose much by dumping them in a game with 100xBB stacks.

Keith Jackson
@ Fri Apr 20, 2007 06:09:18 AM
18

Great series Ed in such a simple format. This will improve anyones game.

DiamondDog
@ Tue Jul 24, 2007 05:07:31 AM
19

Great series, Ed.

Thanks for making it available.

If I may say so, I definitely think you have the outline of a book here. Especially if you were to add maybe a dozen example hands for each Step - some showing us how people get it wrong, some showing us how to do it right.

Why not link to this series from your main page?

Excellent website.
Thanks again.

20

[...] non-profits 947.  Top 13 Things You Can Pimp - From Bentleys to Bathrooms 948.  7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 1: Play Tight 949.  10 Effective Ways to Remember Names 950.  Top Ten Reasons Why No One [...]

Allen Omepo
@ Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:57:17 AM
21

Ed and gang. Having rules is dumb. you cant worry to much about what a guy has before the flop. if he raises he could have so many diffent hands. as long as you dont over commit your self to a pot you can always get away from a iffy hand. If i think maybe im behind in a hand before flop i call as long its not too much and i see the flop. then i make my judgement from their. I disagree with not loosening up when it gets lesser than 9 people in a game. A10 becomes more powerful in a 5 to 4 handed game then it does a 9

22

[...] is important for non-profits 947. Top 13 Things You Can Pimp - From Bentleys to Bathrooms 948. 7 Easy Steps to No-Limit Hold’em Success — Step 1: Play Tight 949. 10 Effective Ways to Remember Names 950. Top Ten Reasons Why No One Clicks on Your Ads 951. 10 [...]

Leave a Reply




You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>